From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07A371DC7 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:05:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=intel; t=1491314705; x=1522850705; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2OT8nKXjRWpjOaWQe+1pUDZe1CrVKQB5RchHwWLQxhg=; b=m6YkeOX7V6qGjfb8uughI1Z6eyMLh4hFttwATo/MVZX4+8bks4j9C22K spZgSTPOZPBIxDuZrQH5beCVxuJF2Q==; Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Apr 2017 07:05:00 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,275,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="243900253" Received: from lsandov1-mobl2.zpn.intel.com ([10.219.128.141]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2017 07:04:59 -0700 Message-ID: <1491315198.17259.96.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Leonardo Sandoval To: "Burton, Ross" Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:13:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <20170404042008.23356-1-leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Eggleton, Paul" , OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftest/devtool: skip test in case of poky-tiny distro X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 14:05:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 11:22 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 4 April 2017 at 05:20, > wrote: > The recipe being tested (devtoo-test-patch-gz) by devtool has > dependencies (at > least libxres and virtual/libx11) that cannot be built with > poky-tiny distro so > skip the test for this particular policy. > > > I think that whilst this is probably a good fix for now as we're > trying to stabilise, changing the test so that it can be built with > poky-tiny would be sensible. Agree. We need to think of a 'simpler recipe' used by devtool test case that can be used together with non-poky distros. > > > Ross