Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
To: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukkonen@intel.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftest/recipetool: skip create_git in case x11 feature is not present
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:49:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491576559.31049.54.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHiDW_EF2H0urVd7uV4vX9Wfma6LSOvP+nXVOtu2icJA=-M9vQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 08:57 +0300, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6 April 2017 at 19:41, <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
> wrote:
>         From: Leonardo Sandoval
>         <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
>         
>         The unit test requires x11 as distro feature, otherwise it
>         will fail
>         while building the test requirements.
> 
> 
> How about changing the test recipe to something non-x11 instead?
>  

Yes, but at this point of the release, I do not think it is a good idea.
There was another case on the devtool's selftest where the target was
quite complex for a poky-tiny distro, but again, it requires time to
redo the test and this is not the perfect time frame.

>         
>         [YOCTO #10903]
>         
>         Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval
>         <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
>         ---
>          meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/recipetool.py | 2 ++
>          1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>         
>         diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/recipetool.py
>         b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/recipetool.py
>         index d47b9dd..7bfb02f 100644
>         --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/recipetool.py
>         +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/recipetool.py
>         @@ -382,6 +382,8 @@ class RecipetoolTests(RecipetoolBase):
>         
>              @testcase(1194)
>              def test_recipetool_create_git(self):
>         +        if 'x11' not in get_bb_var('DISTRO_FEATURES'):
>         +            self.skipTest('Test requires x11 as distro
>         feature')
>                  # Ensure we have the right data in shlibs/pkgdata
>                  bitbake('libpng pango libx11 libxext jpeg libcheck')
>                  # Try adding a recipe
>         --
>         2.10.2
>         
>         --
>         _______________________________________________
>         Openembedded-core mailing list
>         Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>         http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> 
> 




      reply	other threads:[~2017-04-07 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-06 16:41 [PATCH] selftest/recipetool: skip create_git in case x11 feature is not present leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez
2017-04-07  5:57 ` Jussi Kukkonen
2017-04-07 14:49   ` Leonardo Sandoval [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1491576559.31049.54.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jussi.kukkonen@intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox