Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] -cross recipes: ignore TARGET_ARCH sstate hash

[Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>]

On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 19:25 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> I'd tweak the subject line to recipes/*-cross:
> 
> On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 16:56 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > "yocto-compat-layer.py --machines" showed that shared packages like
> > gcc-cross-powerpc64 have a sstate signature that depends on
> > TUNEFLAGS. As a result, there are unnecessary rebuilds and potential
> > conflicts in a multiconfig.
> > 
> > That's due to the way how TARGET_ARCH is set. Richard Purdie
> > suggested
> > setting TARGET_ARCH[vardepvalue] as fix, which works. It would be
> > shorter to do that in cross.inc instead of repeating the relevant
> > line
> > in different recipes, but Richard was concerned about potential
> > side-effects in other usages of cross.inc.
> 
> s/cross.inc/cross.bbclass/g

Okay, will do both as part of V4.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.