From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C3C77D25 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id v3CFPFEf020683 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:25:16 +0100 Message-ID: <1492010715.26846.1.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: wei.tee.ng@intel.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:25:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1491789524-26109-1-git-send-email-wei.tee.ng@intel.com> References: <1491789524-26109-1-git-send-email-wei.tee.ng@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Set linux-firmware to correct license X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:25:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sun, 2017-04-09 at 18:58 -0700, wei.tee.ng@intel.com wrote: > From: "Ng, Wei Tee" > > This is the revised version to fix the ipk packaging error as below: > ERROR: linux-firmware-1_0.0+gitAUTOINC+b14134583c-r0 > do_package_write_ipk: Function failed: do_package_ipk > > These patches is to update the SRCREV of linux-firmware to the latest > HEAD > and set the license file explicitly for linux-firmware-carl9170 to > GPL-2. > This also targeted to solve the Bugzilla ID 11090. > > The SRCREV for linux-firmware was updated to the latest in order to > include the GPL-2 license file. The netronome firmware was removed > until rpm packaging issue is resolved. >   > This configuration are build and tested for ipk, rpm and deb > packaging. >   > Please review and provide feedback if you have any. We can't upgrade this recipe at this point in the release unless there is a pressing reason to. You don't list any reason at all for the upgrade here so I can only assume there isn't one. This patch and the ones that depend on it will therefore have to wait for 2.4. Cheers, Richard