From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DD260079 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 16:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2017 09:56:35 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,250,1488873600"; d="scan'208";a="93659472" Received: from lsandov1-mobl2.zpn.intel.com ([10.219.128.119]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2017 09:56:34 -0700 Message-ID: <1493139862.1798.29.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Leonardo Sandoval To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:04:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170420070159.26295.66747@do.openembedded.org> References: <1492670335-245540-1-git-send-email-zhixiong.chi@windriver.com> <20170420070159.26295.66747@do.openembedded.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOKclyBwYXRjaHRlc3Q6IGZhaWx1cmUgZm9yIGJhc2g6IENWRS0yMDE2LTA2MzQ=?= X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 16:56:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 07:01 +0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: bash: CVE-2016-0634 > Revision: 1 > URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/6434/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed > series by patchtest resulting in the following failures: > > > > * Patch bash: CVE-2016-0634 > Issue Missing or incorrectly formatted CVE tag in included patch file [test_cve_tag_format] > Suggested fix Correct or include the CVE tag on cve patch with format: "CVE: CVE-YYYY-XXXX" > This is another false-positive issue raised by patchtest. No need to send a second revision. This has been fixed at the patchtest-oe repo (a3c87df58f76eafcb80b07260f1bcea966eca5ea) Leo > > > If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the > mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your concerns. > Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new > version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the > version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] -> > [PATCH v3] -> ...). > > --- > Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest > Test suite: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe >