From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com (mail-it0-f42.google.com [209.85.214.42]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF29971A05 for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 11:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id c15so65521864ith.0 for ; Wed, 03 May 2017 04:53:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9HhcRXFdBWc7NFd8RpdiXh0lnXjslhEWpbAmCmYvcx0=; b=Ix/0Kws4V49RgsmSfXlh738F9PDAuJbnry3Iq7cBmlrQAete74VI9v1BaAhvEOI+FY PUTYZ41FiXqVGlCZUDbK5aRVBvQPH5myv70ybDFkmtL9sQVr4s/sVwpQza+2spka9gAp 0C0k6I8jMzW3+dBTPL2kmEjnAWECiYr1dnAh8D9mh3Ve54eJAT8qmyQ/PH2BkJEsG/f4 ga4DnmRqNUKbr+P+HEt7X1RTLJl38yGFxWGuLPyYEFNO2LPgNKkERUIaYjfSqbG2U1Pi DWnlMwsqDAwhBtt3RsyEREJWbFTBp/jfMdRzzLs3m5Bcj4CTi+cOO3NawqCojocRvJSx zW9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9HhcRXFdBWc7NFd8RpdiXh0lnXjslhEWpbAmCmYvcx0=; b=IqEx1ZrxkUcnr10LPP3Jjv19gVQ7Nkc/NYMMUhMNRW4yC53Ny6aAsgWOl9HgzvSjtg w05ILWelnl8XqngITjPVhryaOIryjTPB7OLZAocm+qHgZxSMgNgfIUApggnOfEg6uK34 HBnfJYHpkVO1H8orcrbts17xDEbZ1QjaowOspcBZxBTjJsvfCutMzwyylLOvLwTjDzgt It0h4EQligpY5SbOB0W8Ucg2t3cXzMJmnTUeuXPVDbfLrSC8RNWiKUHJVhJc6Enz5CZJ L3UOdelW2vX+T71MKp7HMW72QTBvyxmIAwQZGqXlsglUDfFCC3YDBgXnJppgbku2dhY6 1NgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7M7Ibr0VI3+rgxPRZ4zjVjm64YkT5xg1FAKFtsKYojJU/7mHoP i/6R90VxxrjcrvBV X-Received: by 10.36.19.193 with SMTP id 184mr124048itz.93.1493812413733; Wed, 03 May 2017 04:53:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8CE40.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.206.64]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 139sm9244115ioz.2.2017.05.03.04.53.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 May 2017 04:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1493812409.4241.247.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Richard Purdie Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 13:53:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1493810039.23535.57.camel@linuxfoundation.org> References: <1493810039.23535.57.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] QemuRunner: avoid tainting os.environ X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 11:53:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 12:13 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > Why not pass in an env to the subprocess call in launch()? Then it wouldn't get logged. Not a particularly strong argument, though. If that's preferred, I can change the implementation. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.