From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAE77017D for ; Thu, 4 May 2017 23:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id d79so6568132wmi.2 for ; Thu, 04 May 2017 16:48:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2JFbrEPSMsATW6pKLFfyMHCrHZXp3Y+JOJw3OEvuYlA=; b=N9as255iYV1D0cPyr5mzJHTHwvf/mC/wBa9tBfrjjweiwg2pxveg/pCc/RJfJSJ1y+ M4uL/4LdXNs66X8woWc8yA5GBWpbfWeJeD/AVE52FYWJ3avIvuicrOeOqrzTXlAyAoga e0kfg+TblUUBbsrNBqwCNDxdAIp0m9M4cV01sXv3uJJ6XAKHWVG/aElU082QGv88MeiL DWJiRdmQMD5IUxYWIa3ZQVHzSQq9WqhSUT70Epd9hs8BAGPwvZROK4LQxnLsYRNL+zZC W3viLBoYI/NpLQvm48UloI+8TKYVVzR5D1NEGh3ZvUg9jcNrh/A8Ruzkd9Xp9+TB8U/8 941w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2JFbrEPSMsATW6pKLFfyMHCrHZXp3Y+JOJw3OEvuYlA=; b=Gsh1S2vqMYlsRcQp9CKpnCh9fMr/P1ybv455PnWYXBcwHPAqWM4j/ut+03PnQ7P2P2 LpWTj03L+Z1HiyuOLwVIwqlxM2jAxMiCThFTEBTPwL/Q8CBixUI5jewNg/qWO9HV1wkd Tqo1vVzDhQpXIfq1eCyfqaow2IOReO6nwHmG97I/8Wjj7p8hU50GPww6I2F56LnRkUVt 1gzvvBbcN81QctY/q+DN/coCJI1rtMn+8IAS5adqJOFxkJfV5v9oS5Wwl+id0a4BFJqd wL2pMiwsfgJNWL9mxGoTIzGE6xkt229LZ8Dl/O1I78+dyHpEonmX97edKCYd0NitOnNV ZXNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4PaCgNAxfyuWUHfjnvSyhRmoWV9TLHbOvGkuoMxOsLEWwGs+Sc ciCDr/2blAF4ag== X-Received: by 10.80.153.194 with SMTP id n2mr31521425edb.42.1493941694407; Thu, 04 May 2017 16:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Saturn.local.all (138-14-48-195.pool.dsl-net.ch. [195.48.14.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 41sm993224eds.66.2017.05.04.16.48.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 May 2017 16:48:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1493941692.3022.18.camel@gmail.com> From: Max Krummenacher To: "Burton, Ross" , Alexander Kanavin Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 01:48:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20170503131153.1780-1-alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> <20170503131153.1780-3-alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> <1493836892.2405.4.camel@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] libpng12: remove the recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 23:48:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am Donnerstag, den 04.05.2017, 10:54 +0100 schrieb Burton, Ross: > On 4 May 2017 at 10:18, Alexander Kanavin > wrote: > > > Then meta-oe can continue to host libpng12. > > > > > > > I actually think allowing those recipes to fail and blacklisting them is > > better. Moving libpng12 to meta-oe is the lazy way out; the proper way to > > deal with such regressions is to look at the actual recipes, what they do, > > why they need such an old version of libpng, and whether they should be > > updated or removed from meta-oe altogether. The only way to get people to > > do this real maintenance work is to break the build for them, sadly. I > > cannot take on maintaining things in meta-oe in this way, I have to draw > > the line somewhere, and this is it. > > My concern at the moment is that anything removed now from oe-core will also be removed in oe-core pyro in the foreseeable future but the fix or relocation in meta-xyz will take time. Around the release of morty the same happened with libwnck3 which then made morty fail for anyone using libwnck3. > > For what it's worth, glmark2 was fixed in 2014: > https://github.com/glmark2/glmark2/commit/499aa81a68fb4c8aac1c80f0d6a4cce05941c4cc > > glcompbench appears to be a fork of glmark, so the same fix should be > trivial to apply. I agree that the it is an easy fix for glmark2 and probably not that hard with glcompbench, nonetheless its sometimes nice to get a head start before things break. Max > Ross