Re: should recipes be distro agnostic?

[Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>]

On Thursday 26 January 2012 07:52:22 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> By coincidence I bumped into this in oe-core:
> 
> ./meta/recipes-devtools/apt/apt.inc:EXTRA_OECONF_append_angstrom = "
> ac_cv_glibc_ver=libc6.4"
> 
> That also triggered me to do this:
> 
> frans@frans-desktop:~/workspace/openembedded-core$ grep -r _poky .
> ./meta/recipes-sato/pcmanfm/pcmanfm_0.9.10.bb:DEPENDS_append_poky = "
> libowl"
> ./meta/recipes-sato/pcmanfm/pcmanfm_0.9.10.bb:SRC_URI_append_poky = "
> file://owl-window-menu.patch"
> ./meta/recipes-sato/leafpad/leafpad_0.8.18.1.bb:DEPENDS_append_poky = "
> libowl"
> ./meta/recipes-sato/leafpad/leafpad_0.8.18.1.bb:SRC_URI_append_poky += "
> file://owl-menu.patch;apply=yes "
> ./meta/recipes-sato/pimlico/dates.inc:OWL_poky = "--enable-owl
> --disable-dnd"
> ./meta/recipes-sato/pimlico/dates.inc:DEPENDS_append_poky = " libowl"
> ./meta/recipes-sato/pimlico/dates.inc:SRC_URI_append_poky = "
> file://dates-owl-window-menu.patch;apply=yes "
> ./meta/recipes-sato/pimlico/tasks_0.19.bb:OWL_poky = "--with-owl"
> ./meta/recipes-sato/pimlico/contacts.inc:DEPENDS_append_poky = " libowl"
> ./meta/recipes-sato/pimlico/contacts.inc:OWL_poky = "--enable-owl"
> ./meta/recipes-sato/pimlico/contacts.inc:SRC_URI_append_poky = "
> file://contacts-owl-window-menu.patch;apply=yes "
> ./meta/recipes-sato/pimlico/tasks.inc:DEPENDS_append_poky = " libowl"
> ./meta/recipes-sato/pimlico/tasks.inc:OWL_poky ?= "--enable-owl"
> ./meta/recipes-sato/puzzles/oh-puzzles_git.bb:DEPENDS_append_poky = "
> libowl"
> ./meta/recipes-sato/puzzles/oh-puzzles_git.bb:SRC_URI_append_poky = "
> file://oh-puzzles-owl-menu.patch;striplevel=0 "
> ./meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.6.bb:EXTRA_OECONF_append_poky-lsb
> = " --enable-clocale=gnu"
> 
> I'd hoped oe-core to be core and not know things about distro's etc.
> E.g. the first case with apt, this should probably be fixed with a
> .bbappend in the angstrom layer, shouldn't it.
> And the poky things in a poky layer.

Absolutely, there should be no distro-specific items in OE-Core at all, and I 
have to admit I was not aware they were there. Most of the poky ones seem to 
be related to enabling libowl in various Sato apps - I don't know enough about 
this area to know if we should now just always be applying these or whether 
they indeed need to be moved out. Richard/Saul/anyone else?

Regarding meta-oe, I think we have bigger issues than the items you found (see 
other thread on OE-devel) although they shouldn't be in there either.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre