From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (relay1.mentorg.com [192.94.38.131]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AE171A91 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 15:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-MBX-04.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1d7kQg-0003SI-3c from Awais_Belal@mentor.com ; Mon, 08 May 2017 08:18:30 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.3) by SVR-IES-MBX-04.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 8 May 2017 16:18:27 +0100 Received: from SVR-IES-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([fe80::1072:fb6e:87f1:ed17]) by SVR-IES-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([fe80::1072:fb6e:87f1:ed17%22]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 8 May 2017 16:18:27 +0100 From: "Belal, Awais" To: Alexander Kanavin , "Burton, Ross" Thread-Topic: [OE-core] GUI based images Thread-Index: AQHSx+kRuNkV7b8ke0y+WmQtFZfPpaHqPVkAgAACwACAAAEFgIAASzdi Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 15:18:26 +0000 Message-ID: <1494256705828.91940@mentor.com> References: <1494240698452.53619@mentor.com> , <935aef85-53ff-b5a6-5ce0-f95128778dd2@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <935aef85-53ff-b5a6-5ce0-f95128778dd2@linux.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US, en-IE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [137.202.0.87] MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: GUI based images X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 15:18:31 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Generally, we have resources for maintaining only one GUI desktop in=0A= > oe-core layer, and right now that is Sato. If you're okay with XFCE,=0A= > that is provided via meta-xfce layer=0A= =0A= I should probably quote every email on this thread and say THANKS! for the = information and explanation.=0A= =0A= BR,=0A= Awais=0A= =0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: Alexander Kanavin =0A= Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 4:47 PM=0A= To: Burton, Ross; Belal, Awais=0A= Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org=0A= Subject: Re: [OE-core] GUI based images=0A= =0A= On 05/08/2017 02:43 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:=0A= =0A= > Obviously if you're happy to say "I target desktop users" then there's=0A= > meta-gnome, meta-xfce, and so on.=0A= =0A= I would not recommend meta-gnome, as it's not well maintained, and=0A= should be used only for adding specific gnome apps to an image. It=0A= doesn't define any full 'gnome images' or 'gnome packagegroups' that=0A= would provide an integrated desktop.=0A= =0A= Alex=0A= =0A=