From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com (mail-wr0-f196.google.com [209.85.128.196]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877A771979 for ; Tue, 9 May 2017 19:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f196.google.com with SMTP id w50so2776299wrc.0 for ; Tue, 09 May 2017 12:43:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ib/1rdTG6o2F0AYRD7LiUvGPRwwNTosl0q5Mo9RE2Ds=; b=A+NM7VQYBkAA2ZbCyH0k+sc+o46OhlWneRTHW9oq8F+mPony738GDmqewfzz4g+fAR FKh5VOD2Uh+ghjL3RPuJLO/oNS9kYC3FqqOPkDp5GYHkPdnNnsU9ri5KNv1Y1Kp36MMR motRTohiN+xwTS5SpfhZzWQG5MWyL5kSU78VEErdBqWCNiq0CqCWmfRZXh/BeWlwtjsD fddSeoQw+mUX/dcSRfigAkH776hGw9WRIg+m0BCvAW7qL/Dz1lDCt1sQ9Tne8PxfTzTu pa8u0T2XfK/6XTcGAHChDH4ljD50ZPDuErD4+eO0JjbK0uuPexXwN7ww5l8a2FTfjcIx G9jQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ib/1rdTG6o2F0AYRD7LiUvGPRwwNTosl0q5Mo9RE2Ds=; b=otnFkLZs+zAvy1BDTz+1I4FcAbp6/wWEzSeZ0LJ+VIeOTzpQFwbJSnrPKozfcv5PpX TlLNOv+0mfadHGJCxSgFjrix86p2/4Cftem4zsAMGxvev9KgjavWv/H9VVVyRkK6Loiw vP4h0HfMXaRDYADflDgQyyyEhN2T3fnFfYpLqVWF+gzkX5Rg/Ee2T88DY4VADsgefkmn n5AmiCEqMTaAqhQQGD6uS/M8UiB+77K5aCjZVr6wNli0rxeaef8eZLAChLJN57R4QfR3 FBJ9wVwvXBoiAgFDGX7ISeMZ+eLvFYy3QXXn/gplB6ThGsiw6QM+ksySHvnxHD0DasBV xLmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCWS8wPqr/1xzuD2A9L8ypYuwyRS6GZH+vVpdKRi0ye/8+lyvYa ADNQ5UiEh0y6hQ== X-Received: by 10.80.184.57 with SMTP id j54mr1368871ede.172.1494359019874; Tue, 09 May 2017 12:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Saturn.local.all (138-14-48-195.pool.dsl-net.ch. [195.48.14.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4sm261103edt.64.2017.05.09.12.43.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 May 2017 12:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1494359018.2459.2.camel@gmail.com> From: Max Krummenacher To: Alexander Kanavin , Khem Raj , "Burton, Ross" Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 21:43:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <9779c7ca-6b12-a4d8-9fe4-c23c950ccfa3@linux.intel.com> References: <1494240698452.53619@mentor.com> <9779c7ca-6b12-a4d8-9fe4-c23c950ccfa3@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: GUI based images X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 19:43:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am Dienstag, den 09.05.2017, 11:10 +0300 schrieb Alexander Kanavin: > On 05/09/2017 01:50 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > > A general usecase is that someone takes the reference and tweaks it to > > meet the needs of a product quickly. For such usecases, it would be good to > > consider the most widely used UI framework in embedded space. I > > personally don't know how much sato is deployed but QT based systems > > are quite widely deployed as far as I know. I think users can drive maximum > > out of the testing and stabilization we do if they were using the reference > > software as much as possible. > > Qt itself does not provide a UI, so we would need to find an appropriate > qt-based replacement for Sato that has the same characteristics and is > suitable as an 'engineering UI'. What is your suggestion for that? > > I personally think meta-qt5 works fine; it's only missing a reference UI > environment. Why not add LxQt to that layer? > Andreas already has those recipes in meta-qt5-extra: https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/recipe/39614/ And for those who want a look at LXDE: http://git.toradex.com/cgit/meta-lxde.git/tree/recipes-lxde/packagegroup/packagegroup-lxde-extended. bb?h=master Max > > Alex