From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com (mail-io0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E9171DC9 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 12:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f178.google.com with SMTP id k91so71962358ioi.1 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 05:24:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CouXcothH5M88hCK190I71M2jzd66w8v/7dzVBpyk6w=; b=qIim7SCcaNQEkSgbYCZZ9dO/2Nut9mtxHkCZkciUE6TErPAi+SBU8y4CTtxWm447Y+ YR+ebFZ6B1gR7KsbfHz3gEC1TmFVikhxq7KDk+qaiV+b/BBSQBXnfegPQrZaSxTtNE/b jfYvVLma/9NEz88xQO1Ixu+r/KGiCzfCSAtBG/U94bClZg4pT4NFlJHL1vCd1P5okObl TXHNrX7u6r1x6hfahfdlMNnwOlzY8A2jXtsAgAhcTmJH8bBmTqtPmFvXrZsb7H+OUhT5 Bd04qD+Cjd3I1ecytDHMzGCaXzpgx8V3dSbojbuh237AG59+1fYMVTVH8SnBCFhuhQwK yrvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CouXcothH5M88hCK190I71M2jzd66w8v/7dzVBpyk6w=; b=P60q0gspMBYFYita0gcWec6z1SgPGrCN1fI+V+luNVSOqWklHPYKJZHzxY2xsEutuR ujGBOMOzrFKt0AiavlLRdf4SMfO3mmxmNJwPUdFkT7IW+5r9fPhH971VcMNF5djoSHb1 iP1CkSvSGlYyVALP979Bi7W0SpE7rcPjCd/6HmYAx/tSo+0c9xcXemmatDPzaXIQTwMQ eUIqR5wZMs4fCLziMbArsS8zHKFD5DtaD+AIV0cQRw6cZs75RSK8S+zzR36cvM/tKvIs aRhP/fv+YON6UQrMz4JdyoDd7352XrpzUFyijUwnaybuFlbr9Rrxeo1T/yXHwBFIJ7JB 53Bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBvyEo/NufhyoChD+61mG1nUJhmA5k80Qkh8wB6lO547w54nb4/ 0bqavg8Imq1pr5Qb4Bs= X-Received: by 10.107.2.6 with SMTP id 6mr4748360ioc.165.1494851045572; Mon, 15 May 2017 05:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8F79A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.247.154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k79sm4516640itk.26.2017.05.15.05.24.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 May 2017 05:24:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1494851042.1179.246.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Alexander Kanavin Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 14:24:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <237a1d6e-7c01-2488-c6a2-e5d0c95aff53@linux.intel.com> References: <9f9ebf2e1ba6eda48fb5e3f20d4ca5bbabe3dad4.1494837087.git-series.patrick.ohly@intel.com> <237a1d6e-7c01-2488-c6a2-e5d0c95aff53@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] manpages.bbclass: avoid QA warning when "manpages" feature not supported X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 12:24:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 14:47 +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 05/15/2017 11:32 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > Activating API documentation with: > > INHERIT += "manpages" > > DISTRO_FEATURES_append = " api-documentation" > > You do not need to add the first line at all, why are you doing it? I thought that was how the class was meant to be used. "Inherit this class" in manpages.bbclass is ambiguous. > manpages is inherited on a per-recipe basis when the recipe itself > supports the manpages PACKAGECONFIG. Now it starts to make sense... > This patch is unnecessary. Agreed. Patchwork-Status: Rejected -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.