Re: [PATCH 1/2] bitbake.conf: DISTRO_FEATURES as overrides

[Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>]

On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 13:16 +0000, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
> > My feelings are:
> > 
> > * We need to use a prefix. We've been burnt too many times in the past
> >   when not using these. "df-" is fine, users will just have to deal
> >   with it.

Fine with me.

> > * We should filter the list of overrides to those which the distro
> >   wants to nominate. I really don't want to encourage wider spread of
> >   things than we need to, these need to be conscious decisions.
> 
> Isn't there a risk that will be confusing? I.e., recipes that use, e.g., 
> bb.utils.contains() to check if a distro feature is set will be affected 
> as soon as the feature is added to DISTRO_FEATURES, but recipes that 
> use the override will only be affected if the feature has also been 
> added to some filter variable.

I'm not sure. I guess it boils down to proper documentation.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.