From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com (mail-it0-f41.google.com [209.85.214.41]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C0D7829C for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 19:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id m47so2419862iti.1 for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 12:26:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UaVqOWbyID+25LHVudXphtCbBw2WtxcYakaV0lPXjsM=; b=leUZq3G5JaQhpL9vj/R+qsakbVnEwCNx4JN17jICwlbzJiv1pVemPK3I4nOi1SLiN6 klvbNxFNk+mRD2fqBh7xNuYYeno2hhrtZdnO8bQ2Sk//OEkrifiukG6EDIOlQzzLHZLv oO4dXpckjo82sWzvg8aQx+dBPGyEaydpcnih3u5a8Hgqd2D6LPmkNZe6OfTo3MOtnhue zRCLBk/cyvKiLRv9TpRh7YQ9kDyrUrUh0ayYk45UVlmmymIwqgL/umjM2hRdo53+c1dO piJcDpyuK/Nx0enWpGxDwIbBsINl/1zhvAXJgmHbwwSUBdNgMDynZsP/kWdWGNwnKLYx VSxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UaVqOWbyID+25LHVudXphtCbBw2WtxcYakaV0lPXjsM=; b=uYE3zUTC+2ZKoTC+/tC/sifErxW2+xl80Ls5ijubBsehUVTxR5AvpIxEguhAFJdVRt mwfVELV3SQ7TPASpHDd46XHFYE5dbqaxJfXrrPg4p8Vk3buvdypHDGr80QHrI5UNvpXT fdaC0O454sQnI23ufr+3ZV5ILP1hTJMsi3IS2qMcArAerzhV1lls7dhIwxuADnDZ/Km5 YcHAV1np9mB93nfWtKJ4hev3LgYtObxuJaPyICKwKfUXsW4cmZWLRdeULySHK7E/jGyL 1MHsaY7UTXt5bTwWxBy1qjI+GtqI1iUbh218YvRGSJ4CbStT6JBg2UkVBaDY0MzhOujs ex5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCuQEyoxjX3XfM7xp6036FRHlTtODKzoFWd4x52iVapNi9ljs6P KOIz1BpnQ+EzJ+G4 X-Received: by 10.36.211.69 with SMTP id n66mr1121739itg.36.1497036385430; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 12:26:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8C0DE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.192.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w14sm260976itb.28.2017.06.09.12.26.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Jun 2017 12:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1497036380.30163.221.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Fan Xin Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 21:26:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1496638270-4482-1-git-send-email-fan.xin@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1496638270-4482-1-git-send-email-fan.xin@jp.fujitsu.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpica: Upgrade 20150515 -> 20170303 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 19:26:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 13:51 +0900, Fan Xin wrote: > -@@ -569,6 +574,8 @@ FlOpenMiscOutputFiles ( > +@@ -607,6 +611,8 @@ FlOpenMiscOutputFiles ( > > if (Gbl_DebugFlag) > { > -+ int fd; > ++ int fd; Looks like you (accidentally?) also changed whitespaces while rebasing the patch... > +@@ -635,6 +641,8 @@ FlOpenMiscOutputFiles ( > + exit (1); > } > -+ Gbl_Files[ASL_FILE_DEBUG_OUTPUT].Handle = stderr; > > ++ Gbl_Files[ASL_FILE_DEBUG_OUTPUT].Handle = stderr; > ++ ... and added lines. Not a big deal, but you diff could have been smaller if you hadn't made these unnecessary changes. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.