From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f50.google.com (mail-it0-f50.google.com [209.85.214.50]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4687178209 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 06:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f50.google.com with SMTP id m62so19542884itc.0 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:22:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BUiHDqiusprYJK5mat/6U0w6dLpL0xVvBFJKkh6H8jY=; b=Sa6XbF2TGK5QuXYESwMCatT/T0mcdDFRg1UbY13Hl3lXj2YXb5RM6sRAd0qy1FvSN1 lZKoombmRmUQ07vScleR/6Jm6/0bJiQBK5a8Mk3KDJDlgQ8T3Mp9qcjn7UZNJ28NnrHP cFzgniL+Cn5ka79PGj3XMLabARLC4HkQqaMo3Kblbvl/CseAIsT9Z6kqRgAKGxRg5RXe H+3hGmpCAOOeGicVXdtDESpXPb8+S7T9sldnakN4HlA//luSZWvwTybkn/SBNdCXqznf Rr8htYEfmeFsNsjS4sjMEpxfbfZ3MKicGEY/cHn05jn51RMqRLzHlJVy+waY99zznBvw U7bg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BUiHDqiusprYJK5mat/6U0w6dLpL0xVvBFJKkh6H8jY=; b=tPp/qN/Xzr0H+ARFSVh4bxjWsL+5MVuJkWb4kFRUIX7iQL17uRhUHd1sfrGyjJIYSX fovdcQ+3NnIbLBvTz8r3BSef0eQusTTUnOEipGeVIElG61fqeONLEnlLdvx23pML2eWp VjYT7PNHvhtKNm294t5EmSTyAZOFynX8zTfsWjSNUyLb1pcSoRkhUDyCA0glaesY5/SX gGdUApSTtbXrpxcX4q3iUlhrGyNZPPvACh2rRMF4MJlAbK5LP0125+NkIv/GDd5r3pik Lfoi9Gy+JaH7yu4kHOPhOCcV/cCJDkM5IPOsaAmHVd8gTuzrzu5shx5cMrTM40crahbP QrIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBH73syWyxyII3ABUHuWfvo+b0S6fPI6Up0MffovYqMaNXegVkP fRYCEKavJ1wfv389UsQ= X-Received: by 10.36.141.134 with SMTP id w128mr10178737itd.84.1497248570527; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8DFA4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.223.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g198sm3666349itb.29.2017.06.11.23.22.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1497248565.30163.223.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Denys Dmytriyenko Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:22:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170611184701.GQ28053@denix.org> References: <20170611184701.GQ28053@denix.org> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Yocto Compatible 2.0 support code X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 06:22:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2017-06-11 at 14:47 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 03:04:02PM +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > As discussed in the "[Openembedded-architecture] Yocto Compatible 2.0 > > + signature changes" mail thread, changes in a .bbappend cannot be > > done unconditionally. Making _append and _remove depend on overrides > > which get set based on DISTRO_FEATURES is one way of achieving this. > > Just wanted to confirm that this feature is going to be optional, right? To achieve "Yocto Compatible 2.0" status, something like this will be needed. But not everyone needs (or wants) that, so those who don't are free to not use it, and it is off by default. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.