From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9A9782F6 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2017 09:34:50 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,338,1493708400"; d="scan'208";a="867541822" Received: from lsandov1-mobl2.zpn.intel.com ([10.219.128.119]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2017 09:34:49 -0700 Message-ID: <1497372226.23013.4.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Leonardo Sandoval To: Alexander Kanavin Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:43:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <7f117fed-029a-56e9-b7cd-f342a1f377e6@linux.intel.com> References: <20170612145805.11599-1-alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> <1497295764.26945.217.camel@linux.intel.com> <1497370534.23013.3.camel@linux.intel.com> <7f117fed-029a-56e9-b7cd-f342a1f377e6@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpm: run binary package generation via thread pools X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:34:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 19:13 +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > Have you ran these all at once? If so, then the wall times aren't very > meaningful: if the CPU is already saturated by having a lot of bitbake > tasks running, then adding further threads to these tasks isn't going to > make anything finish faster than before. I ran them serially > > > Alex >