Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
	 openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkg-config: allow kernel to be build with esdk
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:38:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1498261106.13914.248.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1498229267.24449.132.camel@linuxfoundation.org>

On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 15:47 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 07:03 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> > 
> > When the kernel's menuconfig target is called while using the esdk
> > or
> > an esdk-based container, the pkg-config info that is found is not
> > correct.
> > The pkg-config info is for the target, but we need the eSDK's
> > information in order to build the host based menuconfig.
> > 
> > The new pkg-config script checks both that it's in SDK and being
> > called from the check-lxdialog script in order to limit the scope
> > of
> > when the pkg-config automagically switches to pkg-config-native.
> > 
> > This script also replaces the default pkg-config-native script.
> > 
> > [YOCTO #11155]
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> 
> To be honest, I'm scared of adding this kind of complexity to the
> system. I appreciate the problem you're trying to solve but I worry
> adding this kind of change is complex, invasive and introduces too
> much
> risk.
> 
> I have some specific worries with this implementation too, in
> particular that it changes on target pkg-config, it really should
> only
> change nativesdk-pkgconfig? If we have risk, we want to minimise that
> risk and adding this wrapper everywhere doesn't seem to do that...
> 
There is no nativesdk-pkgconfig, but I had some confusion around the
pkg-config-native and it's usage of a pkg-config binary.  I was getting
some recursion initially and my feeble brain thought it was the target
version :-(.

I have rebuilt this patch and will send a V2 that ONLY affects the pkg-
config-native, basically expands the script to check if it's being
called as -native or from the Kernel's check-lxdialog.

I am also going to change the script such that it checks it's base name
of pkg-config and only then add the parent pid name checking. 

I hope that will mitigate the risk.

Sau!


> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2017-06-23 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-14 14:03 [PATCH] pkg-config: allow kernel to be build with esdk Saul Wold
2017-06-20 14:03 ` Saul Wold
2017-06-23 14:47 ` Richard Purdie
2017-06-23 23:38   ` Saul Wold [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1498261106.13914.248.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox