From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bitbake.conf: Add sdl-config to HOSTTOOLS if using host SDL
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:05:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1498554326.7464.33.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170601121552.27868-1-net147@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 22:15 +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote:
> If ASSUME_PROVIDES contains libsdl-native, we need to add sdl-config
> to HOSTTOOLS to allow access to the host sdl-config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> index 8e4f4bbb56..3ad905c917 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> @@ -471,6 +471,9 @@ HOSTTOOLS += " \
> # Tools needed to run testimage runtime image testing
> HOSTTOOLS += "ip ping ps scp ssh stty"
>
> +# Link to sdl-config if using host SDL
> +HOSTTOOLS += "${@bb.utils.contains('ASSUME_PROVIDES', 'libsdl-native', 'sdl-config', '', d)}"
> +
Why are you checking ASSUME_PROVIDES? The variable is called
ASSUME_PROVIDED.
Even if you had checked the right variable, is that really necessary?
I'm building qemu with ASSUME_PROVIDED += "libsdl-native" just fine on
Debian Jessie, without sdl-config in HOSTTOOLS.
Sorry for the late reply, going through my backlog... I see that this
has been merged. Probably needs to be reverted or fixed.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-01 12:15 [PATCH v2] bitbake.conf: Add sdl-config to HOSTTOOLS if using host SDL Jonathan Liu
2017-06-27 9:05 ` Patrick Ohly [this message]
2017-06-27 9:53 ` Jonathan Liu
2017-06-27 10:02 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-06-27 10:09 ` Burton, Ross
2017-06-27 10:21 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-06-27 10:24 ` Jonathan Liu
2017-06-27 10:38 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-06-27 11:11 ` Jonathan Liu
2017-06-27 15:50 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-06-27 12:54 ` Richard Purdie
2017-06-27 12:56 ` Jonathan Liu
2017-06-27 13:02 ` Jonathan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1498554326.7464.33.camel@intel.com \
--to=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
--cc=net147@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox