Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Scott Murray <scott.murray@konsulko.com>
Cc: openembedded-architecture
	<openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org>,
	openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [Openembedded-architecture] OE-Core/Yocto Project's first CVE (CVE-2017-9731)
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 23:08:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1498774123.9571.5.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1706281335150.8288@godzilla.spiteful.org>

On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 13:38 -0400, Scott Murray wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Richard Purdie wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I suspect this has been missed by some people so I want to spell it
> > out. We have our first CVE in OE-Core itself.
> > 
> > The issue is limited to binary ipks potentially exposing sensitive
> > information through the "Source:" field which contained the full
> > SRC_URI. Those urls could potentially contain sensitive information
> > about servers and credentials.
> > 
> > After discussion, I ended up changing the field to contain the
> > recipe
> > filename (no path). There was talk of filtering the urls however if
> > you
> > try, it becomes clear that sensitive elements can remain and no
> > solution is likely 100% effective. The other package backends don't
> > do
> > this at all so this brings ipk more into line with them. Simply
> > clearing the field doesn't work with the current opkg-utils. It can
> > be
> > changed but the change becomes more invasive.
> > 
> > This fix has been merged to master.
> > 
> > I also did take the decision to backport this change back to
> > pyro/morty/krogoth too. I appreciate this can cause some disruption
> > to
> > people who rely on SRC_URI being in the Source: field however I
> > couldn't see any other realistic way forward.
> I noticed that this wasn't CC'ed to the yocto-security mailing list.
> Was that just an oversight, or should that mailing list be considered
> defunct at this point?

Sorry, it was oversight...

Cheers,

Richard


  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-29 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-19 10:38 OE-Core/Yocto Project's first CVE (CVE-2017-9731) Richard Purdie
2017-06-19 13:20 ` [Openembedded-architecture] " Philip Balister
2017-06-19 13:29   ` Burton, Ross
2017-06-19 13:32     ` Philip Balister
2017-06-19 14:05   ` Mark Hatle
2017-06-19 15:31     ` Sean Hudson
2017-06-20  9:30       ` Paul Eggleton
2017-06-20 13:27         ` Sean Hudson
2017-06-20 13:43           ` Paul Eggleton
2017-06-22  9:21           ` Richard Purdie
2017-06-19 14:06 ` Mark Hatle
2017-06-27  7:11 ` Sona Sarmadi
2017-06-28 17:38 ` [Openembedded-architecture] " Scott Murray
2017-06-29 22:08   ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2017-06-30 20:17     ` Scott Murray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1498774123.9571.5.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=scott.murray@konsulko.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox