From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com (mail-it0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7161A70101 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 09:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id v202so84750431itb.0 for ; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 02:27:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8wfOhZKYA2OVfhlZ0zzOkh9+xx9rIp5Km35o2Gwrm9M=; b=u8eVpiDIhCSSbr7rWIZeCouHbdyO1NBItzXdaCAe3AGkVI459eflYlPF+YLlWk4gN6 gJR92yB/KhreqJ/xtDCTrDCJH79D3RaQyEI36aqwE5Q7oi2lcCDsESkmP27EgIdria9K mwdQ2XSL7fMXg6DmkVnVdPLPlS5cv0S6Iq6wWe0upWQt64yKqDucOMZYc0wdA3SVG+2j T79oYD4iYGSkXnceDfHpuThd1dMxLa9aGW7OUMpt2G1IN5Gc7/saex71RJfgJ8N9Acdt w1T0sohgMiVtRQ35Eoj5iez3i53PhxZ2xy3cqb6rbQnjmiq23f3G3KWysPH68QnWdrd5 KyaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8wfOhZKYA2OVfhlZ0zzOkh9+xx9rIp5Km35o2Gwrm9M=; b=ImQymwPZNXx6BC3PzOSFpKpS1jRkPcEZ7/8KUMDks2fBYuCO85sX3gExr+0vqZdAPk KaqiAbiwiZM9LwPpm5yMHOpdQ7b/4y++iGSZFM/DK8FpHEu3Xce666ePopPMms2HmebA MdCsY8wF7AV64oMnrUe1VFkBHSd4CyxRkxsqimeicAq9WYkCf+Y4NonvC4iD5k582m4x 421y6jCgsR2uqGwqbF+DEwE+awslAdZTFtvHvv3DXGibEzi5rY4JR5Dn3OWvFJJXLXB5 6rcGJTBxh8wBv3nfidK3dNq4Obus7Q9vAWUSPBHr+yniNO/uMNjs+wct/SP44CFkFzJQ p7ng== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111T6Wche3eZPLEG2YFsHl8bta7XADEn7UM3BR9W10mYn86Ul1f/ 0uiIOIQhKrh+nef3 X-Received: by 10.36.6.200 with SMTP id 191mr8063490itv.44.1499074076672; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 02:27:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8EF7A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.239.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z64sm8201501iod.55.2017.07.03.02.27.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Jul 2017 02:27:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1499074073.5259.74.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 11:27:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170703083602.GA5532@linux.intel.com> References: <20170630175330.33908-1-alejandro.hernandez@linux.intel.com> <20170703083602.GA5532@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bootimg-efi.py: Use IMGDEPLOYDIR instead of DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE for initrd X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:27:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 11:36 +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:53:30AM -0700, Alejandro Hernandez wrote: > > When using wic to create an image from a certain build, wic is expecting > > to find initrd at the final destination of our images (DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE), > > which is wrong, since the initrd file has not been copied to the final > > directory yet, > > Is it possible to ensure that initrd is deployed before wic is run by > making do_image_wic depend on initrd deploy task? Not in this case, because both do_image_wic and do_image_cpio share the same deploy task. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.