From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181F0775DE for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jul 2017 07:43:07 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,312,1496127600"; d="scan'208";a="282393128" Received: from lsandov1-mobl2.zpn.intel.com ([10.219.128.119]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Jul 2017 07:43:06 -0700 Message-ID: <1499266357.24688.13.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Leonardo Sandoval To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 09:52:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170705123124.2383.65519@do.openembedded.org> References: <20170705123124.2383.65519@do.openembedded.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOKclyBwYXRjaHRlc3Q6IGZhaWx1cmUgZm9yIFZ1bGthbiBpbXByb3ZlbWVudHM=?= X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 14:43:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 12:31 +0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: Vulkan improvements > Revision: 1 > URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/7583/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed > series by patchtest resulting in the following failures: > > > > * Issue Upstream-Status is in incorrect format [test_upstream_status_format] > Suggested fix Fix Upstream-Status format in meta/recipes-graphics/vulkan/vulkan-demos/0001-Don-t-build-demos-with-questionably-licensed-data.patch so it is one of: Pending, Submitted, Accepted, Backport, Denied, Inappropriate > Jussi, just checking this issue an apparently you misspelled the upstream-status. In the other hand, I have improved the output of this check so it would be easier to see what went wrong (will show current status and valid ones in separate lines). Leo > > > If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the > mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your concerns. > Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new > version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the > version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] -> > [PATCH v3] -> ...). > > --- > Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest > Test suite: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe >