From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4155178152 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 20:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2017 13:56:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,351,1496127600"; d="scan'208";a="107502536" Received: from lsandov1-mobl2.zpn.intel.com ([10.219.128.119]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2017 13:56:13 -0700 Message-ID: <1499893555.5349.62.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Leonardo Sandoval To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:05:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170712200120.2381.91363@do.openembedded.org> References: <20170712200120.2381.91363@do.openembedded.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOKclyBwYXRjaHRlc3Q6IGZhaWx1cmUgZm9yIG9lcWEgY29yZSBhbmQgb2Utc2VsZnRlc3QgdGhyZWFkZWQgZW5hYmxlbWVudCAocmV2Mik=?= X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 20:56:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 20:01 +0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: oeqa core and oe-selftest threaded enablement (rev2) > Revision: 2 > URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/7694/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed > series by patchtest resulting in the following failures: > > > > * Issue Series does not apply on top of target branch [test_series_merge_on_head] > Suggested fix Rebase your series on top of targeted branch > Targeted branch master (currently at b1c4661742) Just dig into it and found the following: the above issue raised by patchtest is due to the below one. The safest is to rebase against oe-core, not poky and send the patch or patches to the correct ML. Leo > > * Issue Series sent to the wrong mailing list or some patches from the series correspond to different mailing lists [test_target_mailing_list] > Suggested fix Send the series again to the correct mailing list (ML) > Suggested ML poky@yoctoproject.org [http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/] > Patch's path: meta-yocto-bsp/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/systemd_boot.py > > > > If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the > mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your concerns. > Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new > version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the > version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] -> > [PATCH v3] -> ...). > > --- > Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest > Test suite: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe >