From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f177.google.com (mail-pf0-f177.google.com [209.85.192.177]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566F16E671 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 19:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f177.google.com with SMTP id t86so14915819pfe.2 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 12:39:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wijngPo2L7nDFkOZw3UZ6pXtkb8mlESSUgY8kuaZrck=; b=bKLYLRsL1IKmli/Xbkn9XGxO8WwOjpMS4il8+BEplaraUYXsbLjjrQnE1ykMqUm6W/ LW1zKjGhIYzO33K73kuWEveTazsjkpQHHuTOB2sUaARco5LUQDihmMlg14+r0RbLtGPW 3qSDvpOpltuMHxJoxjxrt64e0+7o+7jWvcNuqrELkfSWBD8HVZkWD4xPTISFYe2lFdZM UKVjngCeu7lllBD8sis1egRqK/oylyugwoR4TASNbFtY+BmwAae2+eSKn+6S4FXMVg6m 5gpYyCCLAxSC5bgI5BpdzRtKSwpWswnynbpRa+y4q3KsIakmJPZc/QPXqWc3uB5Mm/96 Sh4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wijngPo2L7nDFkOZw3UZ6pXtkb8mlESSUgY8kuaZrck=; b=b2KolNhwIUOBGs12cbaqSaeR4mOW5wJLhuIKd0/d3ZEx2wpVAbqVX1McoWsO0PZxfz r6VvH1kWKUN+1n+XAZsTOXfNe1X0xyY/tl8IuvriPXdQ5MOMP37aDcK9ijwt47rRDrF4 h68FF6XQliIL/GeeNYsRpudOOgu46Fuw8zVXiUTxdJyjbS0PGNqAT1zjA5lGYTth/c07 23FPAWxdzayDEFqJkjh5R93in2+X32/3MgA53iWOpmM3Qoo/VtDG+SJm+Z9LgetGqSMT 6aUl96zFGneo4gGT8FxyLUg6/f6zN89XBERP7nwqzhb0ZpLv85F69Wjq+aEnca53K8U8 pemw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113cs1iqGZDZKAmI2Y6PuQWIlJPNwzqKRffCfu2VrPMLkP2njiSv 6k4FBWN5zsbQITSI X-Received: by 10.84.247.2 with SMTP id n2mr17953549pll.457.1501529992429; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 12:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8FE53.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.254.83]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v86sm49816160pfa.6.2017.07.31.12.39.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 12:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1501529984.18875.33.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: wei.tee.ng@intel.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 21:39:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: saul.wold@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] initramfs-framework: include install-efi module in recipe for installation X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 19:39:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sun, 2017-07-23 at 16:51 -0700, wei.tee.ng@intel.com wrote: > + > +SUMMARY_initramfs-module-install-efi = "initramfs support for installation option" > +RDEPENDS_initramfs-module-install-efi = "${PN}-base parted e2fsprogs-mke2fs dosfstools util-linux-blkid" > +FILES_initramfs-module-install-efi = "/init.d/install-efi.sh" By making the install-efi module a part of initramfs-module that is enabled unconditionally, parted now needs to be built for the target even when only the rest of initramfs-module is used. Can the module please be split out into its own recipe? Alternatively one could add a PACKAGECONFIG for it, but that's less flexible. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.