From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f172.google.com (mail-pf0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFBA7844C for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z129so85844590pfb.3 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:32:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QLe3AuVwIuKoO1HPCRvZHyhHAZYSf5+gtDCsfJ/QInM=; b=H6UAw86Mb0Oh7y4AI3L//4u99JoDxI3ryHQEKAiKmK3RglOsr432RQC0Pk77AuEs2t nlWVO6gp1szPGydNwrSSYYY+Oq96Zzer36qBMmJPj508ufkWXZVEYRtXWIht0EMWYDOh 243Mgb5g5+1kD7uMnf6Aw6ZfMgrsFtLbItG0KylqyruiYlggLh8V50OlblO/PrBPMW1I Z+pbw+iLiJrz1KlEKbQslI4cmWDUZqHnD9CSJypYsoAdc1CNFJOnRTfzWI84q/5vzTBj cMruFkr7lgOXbGHN+SMkNzviKcUqoMLDtApEa7Nca4IFe4KxRJDgCbfs2dBCOJSl+8WI Bo1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QLe3AuVwIuKoO1HPCRvZHyhHAZYSf5+gtDCsfJ/QInM=; b=rRCN13/yfs6blVNDQ2S/zep/5GpUspSS+wn2NL8r5WvuIGd53BD1W/kLcbLEtSAPGH CM7TlBc8z88uS6it7siJ3PNVfHxROoFXBo0B/5Qjh86fhqvYfRzv6xaT3/Dk4WC2VAGY bmTxqfXt2y4LZ4fUadfeGg9Tbra7B/qClgJnR9POWbPfbXbkjlhCzj1TYQEx3FqZDahc +x8jNoNErs0+FADETPEa//XTnJtyjDMJ5w+PWXTiSFOWEyxLxVYDuOmGB7Pfm8elzCc9 Vs8Yh3p8Svio7c1+wi+f5m8Dh+jx/DV0AHqULMmnJbe45OqXKlO/4s9IS6snDGTR3jTA ldmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw11065MCCsTDutcI1YS7OfsblosM0HYGZduQeuqpI5AN8OoT1NNmb Fum7xL1k6fkP1hdETDs= X-Received: by 10.99.128.194 with SMTP id j185mr16980061pgd.80.1501533174708; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8FE53.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.254.83]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e79sm50650072pfl.40.2017.07.31.13.32.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1501533167.18875.35.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: wei.tee.ng@intel.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 22:32:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <42ed3bedf773c1fee314a2e4194c9656c583cc9c.1499887221.git.wei.tee.ng@intel.com> References: <42ed3bedf773c1fee314a2e4194c9656c583cc9c.1499887221.git.wei.tee.ng@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] initramfs-framework: module to support boot live image X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:32:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 12:29 -0700, wei.tee.ng@intel.com wrote: > +SUMMARY_initramfs-module-setup-live = "initramfs support for setup > live" > +RDEPENDS_initramfs-module-setup-live = "${PN}-base udev-extraconf" > +FILES_initramfs-module-setup-live = "/init.d/80-setup-live" Same problem as with install-efi: this RDEPENDS in initramfs-framework makes building the recipe more complicated than strictly necessary. Please move setup-live to its own recipe. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.