From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161])
	by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA1878290
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Sun, 13 Aug 2017 08:36:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id
	v7D8aNkH020613
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128
	verify=NOT); Sun, 13 Aug 2017 09:36:24 +0100
Message-ID: <1502613383.18633.287.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Zhixiong Chi <zhixiong.chi@windriver.com>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 09:36:23 +0100
In-Reply-To: <1502421401-112341-1-git-send-email-zhixiong.chi@windriver.com>
References: <1502421401-112341-1-git-send-email-zhixiong.chi@windriver.com>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11
	(dan.rpsys.net [192.168.3.1]);
	Sun, 13 Aug 2017 09:36:24 +0100 (BST)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at dan
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [PATCH] glibc: add ld.so locks in _libc_fork
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 08:36:24 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 11:16 +0800, Zhixiong Chi wrote:
> The patch in this Bugzilla entry was requested by a customer:
>   https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4578
>   https://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19282

I'm a little nervous about accepting a patch which has been sitting in
the glibc bugzilla for around 10 years. Any idea why upstream haven't
taken this?

Cheers,

Richard