From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34847849B for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id v7HD0QT2014471 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:00:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1502974826.13978.212.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Hongxu Jia , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, ross.burton@intel.com Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:00:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1502954107-9252-1-git-send-email-hongxu.jia@windriver.com> References: <1502954107-9252-1-git-send-email-hongxu.jia@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11 (dan.rpsys.net [192.168.3.1]); Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:00:27 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [PATCH] mc: unify curses initialization X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:00:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 03:15 -0400, Hongxu Jia wrote: > Since ncurses upgraded to 6.0+20170715, it compile failed > ... > > > > ../../../mc-4.8.19/lib/tty/tty-ncurses.c:199:13: error: > > dereferencing > pointer to incomplete type 'TERMINAL {aka struct term}' > > > >      cur_term->Nttyb.c_cc[VINTR] = CTRL ('g');   /* ^g */ > >              ^~ > ... > > Backport a patch from upstream fixed the issue. > > Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia Unfortunately there is a version in meta-gplv2 that fails to build: https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-non-gpl3/builds/406 I'm tempted just to delete that recipe at this point as porting the patch to it would have to be done cleanroom style. Cheers, Richard