From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEEF7857B for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id v7I9rbEA023839 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:53:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1503050017.32591.7.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:53:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170816111355.11347-1-adrian.ratiu@ni.com> References: <20170816111355.11347-1-adrian.ratiu@ni.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11 (dan.rpsys.net [192.168.3.1]); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:53:38 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: haris.okanovic@ni.com, ken.sharp@ni.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] oe/path.py: copyhardlinktree: don't overwrite existing symlinks X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:53:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 14:13 +0300, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote: > Starting with tar>=1.26 the default behaviour when extracting is to > overwrite symlinks and a '-h' flag was added for tar to follow them. > > The primary use case for this is to allow ${DEPLOY_DIR_IPK/RPM/DEB} > to > be symlinks and avoid copyhardlinktree replacing those symlinks with > a > normal directory. > > Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu > --- >  meta/lib/oe/path.py | 2 +- >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Does the -h option exist for tar < 1.26? Cheers, Richard