From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7820F784B0 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2017 09:03:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,393,1498546800"; d="scan'208";a="891439185" Received: from lsandov1-mobl2.zpn.intel.com ([10.219.128.134]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2017 09:03:09 -0700 Message-ID: <1503072722.28682.36.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Leonardo Sandoval To: Andrej Valek Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:12:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <78647462-c423-bdc3-8adb-544fe8eee978@siemens.com> References: <78647462-c423-bdc3-8adb-544fe8eee978@siemens.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: bussybox: updating to new version X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:03:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 12:16 +0200, Andrej Valek wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to ask you a question about busybox upgrading. > > Is there any reason, why we are still using the version 1.24.1? > I think that, the latest version 1.27.2 has a lot of fixes and it less > vulnerable then the current. > feel free to send a patch with the upgrade. BTW, this is the upgrade history of the recipe http://recipes.yoctoproject.org/rrs/recipedetail/12601/ > I have checked a license and it has not been changed. > > Thank you for the explanation. > > Andrej