From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] insane.bbclass: write QA issues to log file only when they are in ERROR_QA or WARN_QA
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 22:23:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503350597.32591.77.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+chaQdU05LZtB_LB8y0aMi=Oqe6uyGO=3SY_X4q2xCYtJNZNQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 23:13 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > all messages are put into the log but at differing log levels.
>
> But there aren't the "log levels" in the file (as NOTE, WARN, ERROR)
> now, it writes only P, error message and type of QA check (not the
> selected severity of it, like bb.error, bb.warn, bb.note used in the
> function for normal output).
>
> See the function above package_qa_handle_error:
>
> def package_qa_write_error(type, error, d):
> logfile = d.getVar('QA_LOGFILE')
> if logfile:
> p = d.getVar('P')
> with open(logfile, "a+") as f:
> f.write("%s: %s [%s]\n" % (p, error, type))
>
Sorry, I misread your earlier message and assumed it was logging the
level already. I've spent too long staring at bitbake server bugs :/.
I'm still torn on this, I can see why qa.log makes sense to contain all
the qa issues found and then the WARN/ERROR levels filter the console
output (and ultimately the bitbake exit code). I can also see why in
general we'd not want "levels" in the logfile, its more of a console
issue.
You could do "grep -v version-going-backwards qa.log" I guess?
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-21 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-21 6:56 [PATCH] insane.bbclass: write QA issues to log file only when thei are in ERROR_QA or WARN_QA Martin Jansa
2017-08-21 7:01 ` Martin Jansa
2017-08-21 20:56 ` [PATCHv2] insane.bbclass: write QA issues to log file only when they " Martin Jansa
2017-08-21 21:07 ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-21 21:13 ` Martin Jansa
2017-08-21 21:23 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2017-08-21 21:27 ` Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1503350597.32591.77.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox