Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>,
	Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitbake.conf: fix ineffective include conf/target/${TARGET_SYS}.conf
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:58:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503568703.32591.181.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503567333.3674.8.camel@intel.com>

On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 11:35 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 02:21 -0800, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> > 
> > TARGET_SYS is defined in terms of TARGET_ARCH, so it's not valid
> > until after TUNE_ARCH has been set by the machine config. The
> > original order of includes resulted in an attempt to include
> > non-existent files such as:
> > 
> >   conf/target/INVALID-oe-linux.conf
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > index e421650..18d1cfb 100644
> > --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > @@ -705,9 +705,9 @@ include conf/auto.conf
> >  include conf/local.conf
> >  require conf/multiconfig/${BB_CURRENT_MC}.conf
> >  include conf/build/${BUILD_SYS}.conf
> > -include conf/target/${TARGET_SYS}.conf
> >  include conf/machine/${MACHINE}.conf
> >  include conf/machine-sdk/${SDKMACHINE}.conf
> > +include conf/target/${TARGET_SYS}.conf
> >  include conf/distro/${DISTRO}.conf
> I think conf/target/${TARGET_SYS}.conf must be included after
> ${DISTRO}.conf, because TARGET_SYS contains
> ${TARGET_ARCH}${TARGET_VENDOR} and TARGET_VENDOR gets changed by a
> ${DISTRO}.conf like poky.conf.
> 
> I also found this issue when writing an automated test that detects
> when include file names change while parsing, and I agree that it
> should be either fixed or removed.
> 
> See the "Yocto Compatible 2.0 support code" mail thread for details.
> At
> that time I had missed that there was already a pending patch for it.

I think I'd prefer just to delete the use of TARGET_SYS.conf and
possibly BUILD_SYS.conf too, I'm not aware of any users in practice as
it can't really work at least in one case...

Cheers,

Richard


      reply	other threads:[~2017-08-24  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-22 10:21 [PATCH] bitbake.conf: fix ineffective include conf/target/${TARGET_SYS}.conf Andre McCurdy
2017-08-24  9:35 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-08-24  9:58   ` Richard Purdie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1503568703.32591.181.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=armccurdy@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox