From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561D978487 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 06:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id f127so2641175wmf.1 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 23:45:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xdNI2ud/Iys33jNVOCw1Rfzazh0+pU+ntdQJEP2JuR8=; b=mOR8XCBBSoL/aApmIFmfoZ5302ipxvWAL/ojqHO5zGH3E6NESHRGysIZQZ/WqP1m87 OvctwfRO1KDbGIahIzKDyru5/zwdry3pXlFpOfGnrQOvurBo+tXeYRGaXASIqAmFfGxV irvVspcOfsFU3p5Bo4So5/0V3+6AuFObnfSgGi80VIrJI3/LxujhSoNtL2WExPDj7+Ay Jg6fVERhCY8R+atGEXxT9KZnIYXzBrYN4Tv2JpqKGZ68sc+20ZXPcD+jFLR5ZG78ipER uthGiI3rhJH90nW5TY6nJ6RDEYjuzLzxxYsBprziZCSeiFBLGBG9INHc1J+D8HRInlMg cjNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xdNI2ud/Iys33jNVOCw1Rfzazh0+pU+ntdQJEP2JuR8=; b=Tob2PDGNVx1TWrwLrx380ul9lqcOtD9Ep0jRbreatmtAFTAb9hIZk0S3EqvMUvej3K IlryH5G7d3nyoqhwZ7vi0P2oJD+aod+Wtice1yPsmvHqirvkqPTSJyrK6HGzRdLmlHj5 vUDl8BXaz4/R+53GBqdK/F9Zk72bsVs3L7vSnAlyIgq6AAMJV3H+uzj25ELNyvn3MTtu 4CvQNS9Dk6+Ddzp9vZ8eGZiUn0TtOHbFJqRl22N4+iLtmsWEvgf8p+4hoptbZGB720FE 4qF53COazrRZh5HV2hUc0IINoEFT73cGc0ltCmSarSlpHI6kN53fNX30Yq/OJZbYtTj/ AgRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjc/8UMeIeGlOUxgUZpUSUT9sePyi3GyU2PrGD1YPC/XTq3X9rt I6PRiYbPWUb8QfXSQIsIgg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb5Nwi/kxVxH+T+Q0L2TSS0XOm1IVt+NKkMPxwSOvlQPEwx7WVXMdaFT+XLizEVRI+S1yu9WiQ== X-Received: by 10.28.141.8 with SMTP id p8mr409660wmd.186.1504248319891; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 23:45:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8CC40.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.204.64]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z1sm1473386wmz.45.2017.08.31.23.45.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 23:45:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1504248317.12799.44.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Otavio Salvador , OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 08:45:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1504085996.12799.39.camel@intel.com> References: <20170829204309.16139-1-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1504085996.12799.39.camel@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] initramfs-framework: Change recipe to be allarch X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 06:45:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 11:39 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > As I said before ("Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v6 1/1] initramfs-framework: > module to support boot live image" from July 31st), I consider it a > mistake that support for live boot with all its dependencies was > added directly to initramfs-framework.bb. > > I was in a hurry at the time and therefore didn't file a bug, but I > can also do that. See https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12024 -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.