Re: [PATCH] initramfs-framework: split setup-live and install-efi into separate recipes

[Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>]

On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 15:17 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:04 PM, California Sullivan
> <california.l.sullivan@intel.com> wrote:
> > Having these the initramfs-framework recipe
> > forced initramfs-framework
> > users to build several tools they didn't need, and made it more
> > difficult to declare the recipe as allarch.
> > 
> > Fixes [YOCTO #12024].
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: California Sullivan <california.l.sullivan@intel.com
> > >
> 
> The patch should be based on the allarch patch I sent as it adds the
> dependencies on the whitelist. So you can also set them as allarch.

I would prefer to keep initramfs-framework-setup-live/install-efi as
arch-specific and only make initramfs-framework itself allarch. It's
just a gut feeling about the (minor) advantage of not having to rebuild
these two small recipes vs. the additional complexity of the layer.conf
and having to keep that up-to-date.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.