From: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
To: "Anibal Limón" <limon.anibal@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] scripts/oe-selftest: oe-selftest-internal wrapper scripts that isolates execution
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:21:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1509045677.11251.28@fm-out.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPS-YPCMmGejwfW-VwE--xNrShxxfyocPaTOrKvBf-cZUxdtVA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3811 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Anibal Limón <limon.anibal@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> The patch looks good at first glance, i have some comments,
>
> - We need a way to handle the results output because with this you
> will have N results files, may be extend the shell script
> to consolidate the results file.
As a proof of concept I use 'parallel' which fits nicely to this
exercise (one job corresponds to one oe-selftest -r) and with this
tool, logging can be stored in separate files, each corresponding to a
job's stdout/stderr. But the important here is that the tool prints
each job's output into the standard output either
first-finished-first-print-to-stdout or keeping the same input order,
so at the end, you get the same output as running oe-selftest as a
single job.
> - With this if one selftest depends on other there is no way to now
> it and the execution will fail, i searched into the selftest cases
> (OETestDepends) and now we don't have dependent cases.
Think about this approach as running oe-selftest in different build
folders with its own metadata and build folder. Under this scenario,
the test execution, with the corresponding dependencies will be
fulfilled and executed correctly, right? the trade off is some extra
work done on each oe-selftest due to dependencies but this wont hurt
much in my opinion.
Leo
>
> Cheers,
> Anibal
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:33 PM,
> <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> From: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> The below is a profiling experiment, running oe-selftest -r (the
>> proposed
>> implementation, see patch description for more info):
>>
>> Procedure:
>>
>> With patch 1/1, multiple oe-selftest jobs can be launched in
>> parallel. One tool that launch jobs in parallel is GNU Parallel [1],
>> allowing
>> to construct a simpole pipeline to execute all tests with a pool of
>> four
>> jobs:
>>
>> $ echo $ALLTESTS | time parallel --jobs4 oe-selftest -r
>>
>> where ALLTESTS is a variable containing all tests cases (modules)
>> found by the
>> the runner (oe-selftest-internal) (i.e. ALLTESTS="$(oe-selftest -m |
>> awk '{ print $NF }' | grep -v ':')"). This is the result obtained
>> from the
>> above command:
>>
>> 739.57user 120.48system 45:34.61elapsed 31%CPU
>> (0avgtext+0avgdata 124600maxresident)k
>> 390908inputs+15984336outputs (291major+20227951minor)pagefaults
>> 0swaps
>>
>>
>> The import point on the above numbers is that isolation the
>> oe-selftest execution per
>> module and using a parallelization tool, complete oe-selftest runs
>> takes less than an hour,
>> beating current single-job times observed at main auto-buildes.
>>
>> Profiling results were obtained on a machine with 88 Intel Xeon with
>> 88 cores
>>
>> [1] https://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
>>
>> The following changes since commit
>> 65d23bd7986615fdfb0f1717b615534a2a14ab80:
>>
>> README.qemu: qemuppc64 is not supported (2017-10-16 23:54:31 +0100)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>> git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib
>> lsandov1/oe-selftest-own-directory
>>
>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=lsandov1/oe-selftest-own-directory
>>
>> Leonardo Sandoval (1):
>> scripts/oe-selftest: oe-selftest-internal wrapper scripts that
>> isolates execution
>>
>> scripts/oe-selftest | 102
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> scripts/oe-selftest-internal | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100755 scripts/oe-selftest-internal
>>
>> --
>> 2.12.3
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5287 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-26 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-26 17:33 [PATCH 0/1] scripts/oe-selftest: oe-selftest-internal wrapper scripts that isolates execution leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez
2017-10-26 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/1] " leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez
2017-11-09 17:22 ` Leonardo Sandoval
2017-10-26 18:44 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Anibal Limón
2017-10-26 19:21 ` Leonardo Sandoval [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1509045677.11251.28@fm-out.intel.com \
--to=leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com \
--cc=limon.anibal@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox