From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f68.google.com (mail-lf0-f68.google.com [209.85.215.68]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5D4784D3 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 10:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f68.google.com with SMTP id r135so21635388lfe.5 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:16:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QT0c6uQT0AOL9kSn5yex3wq+GzvMw43JLzYZyuXlG2w=; b=Mbeg6COmdhhybMVe64tkmOu88HrscowWwr0d9sPRL1hKwBMl0IeouHE2/LBCvMTNve LxtImTkVZNfY98Bx7aRnjEC2nwkP4mJVpM6BLWM3VgiWEyWyEK+RQgHmkshDyAr5QvY5 OaDbykf/GCGboCrsSbPvHmrLT6rKhW1vk3B0IZmOACRzbyVLHVFS1fwQjiuUPqo9oyas 27iak3SOLjLkKBnDEYvXBVjim8ftLd8HcU8/MABjMKEhRYHndGfr7euebPiVuj732o+Q JCy9kJstyKC43S1vKpgwafNUW0Zp9dpeqU6/AMxjS884QThvyRxLdUpLvKAFH10BvqbW /Ccg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4J+dDO4/Ount3BUl5cwW8v7UxBnzrYAt3Wtg9kPYYC6KtwPLzH gy60acsUmOLRq+rY9Dh0neVa7epi X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYKzPrfma1rIjj8RdBeXQ1/dGc3kgfbwZtN0EEbIVHQGX7glA/75h/Ie8xBhxQJwTkHYBd25w== X-Received: by 10.25.121.10 with SMTP id u10mr294505lfc.50.1510654570196; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:16:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from tfsielt31850 ([77.107.218.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m26sm600298ljb.61.2017.11.14.02.16.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:16:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1510654568.4049.64.camel@andred.net> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Draszik To: Robert Yang , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 10:16:08 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <62db9387c3ee71f4bed87a7a546afdf927ba5ac0.1510550741.git.Qi.Chen@windriver.com> <1510563249.4049.33.camel@andred.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.1-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] autoconf-archive: inherit allarch and fix package splitting X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 10:16:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 19:54 +0800, Robert Yang wrote: > > On 11/13/2017 04:54 PM, André Draszik wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 13:26 +0800, Chen Qi wrote: > > > autoconf-archive is a set of common m4 macros, it should be allarch, > > > just like it is on other distros. > > > > I have found previously that when changing a recipe to produce more > > generic > > output, like in this case, and the old binary package is still in > > deploy/, > > then the package manager would always pick the more specific version, > > even > > if a more recent (by package version) exists in deploy. In my case I was > > moving from PACKAGE_ARCH=${MACHINE_ARCH} to > > PACKAGE_ARCH=${TUNE_PKGARCH}, > > but I guess it'll be the same here. > > I think that it is because of the priority MACHINE_ARCH > TUNE_PKGARCH > > allarch, > which is the right behavior. I'd say this patch here is a good example why it's not the right behaviour. This patch is making autoconf-archive allarch, i.e. lower priority than before. In other words, anybody who has the previous TUNE_PKGARCH version already will never get an update, even if the version number is bumped. Cheers, Andre'