From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f194.google.com (mail-wr0-f194.google.com [209.85.128.194]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E576271B2A for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f194.google.com with SMTP id k61so19824349wrc.4 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 01:06:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZAsreBT3CrNzeWvOSqWbOiAWvMIuvA3wo9lRDxpVw3M=; b=MoCJ86//y6kfIbjBodKiTYcVCOn/lSIpd2nzW9onzA6iaNs9JyBYk2f6yRVH+qjmxl bRvvFzEwwBVyBj3kCQZwsnvr59OClWLaBPaej/ObVrveSWruNJkJv4TXZwK6p1lyosv4 lm8kCcJx6/0D0u+aayjVznlNwCnscUXjbFRroIfC21pWhFk1TMrOuninKw6EtyQeIc4N XRa0ZYbP+pN0MtVROFgnOW7aufgRsasdpsQcj1geCgalVp1Kcg5eSlrHyu5HPydZ3Bjo 6haxOY+41lKdvK20OT89j1qYbUexah+D+LJs1/Lnq7tNKnxZMHBy/Ne+JV8sqcb71MJP J9xQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7hD/DWdX/ubhKfkeHJWraE7wgFljgp/UKGLoC8Q/wpJs4vmdwy APgmvp3ObkrE4nzKNUAlbOU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaxmW5HvPI1HVuG3JN+5SoSz0oNgr4JGJg3XhAS8yvGgbgBx2pujWcImQaLoLqA3OHhL1yhAw== X-Received: by 10.223.139.3 with SMTP id n3mr13257109wra.166.1510736809747; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 01:06:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from tfsielt31850 ([77.107.218.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h8sm6708098wme.30.2017.11.15.01.06.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 01:06:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1510736807.4049.75.camel@andred.net> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Draszik To: Robert Yang , "Burton, Ross" Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:06:47 +0000 In-Reply-To: <4a8c2156-35df-8786-31c8-b35b8a6588d3@windriver.com> References: <62db9387c3ee71f4bed87a7a546afdf927ba5ac0.1510550741.git.Qi.Chen@windriver.com> <1510563249.4049.33.camel@andred.net> <1510654568.4049.64.camel@andred.net> <1510668148.4049.71.camel@andred.net> <4a8c2156-35df-8786-31c8-b35b8a6588d3@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.1-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] autoconf-archive: inherit allarch and fix package splitting X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:06:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 10:23 +0800, Robert Yang wrote: > > On 11/14/2017 10:02 PM, André Draszik wrote: > > Is that an ipk / OPKG issue? Should something be removing the old > > packages > > from deploy? > > I tried PACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_ipk", I got the same result as ross: OK, so I tried with autoconf-archive myself now. I get the same result as you two. But - When moving a recipe from MACHINE_ARCH to TUNE_PKGARCH then the old package is not removed. [...] > I guess something is wrong with your build. To summarise: - moving a recipe from TUNE_PKGARCH to allarch removes the old package - moving a recipe from MACHINE_ARCH to TUNE_PKGARCH *doesn't* remove the old package. Where would I start looking? Cheers, Andre'