From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61A57806D for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 13:54:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id w03Drxhi018464 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 3 Jan 2018 13:54:01 GMT Message-ID: <1514987639.5525.138.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: "Huang, Jie (Jackie)" , "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 13:53:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1B858668EC6A94408DCA5225FDFA85AA01566B9AEB@ALA-MBC.corp.ad.wrs.com> References: <1B858668EC6A94408DCA5225FDFA85AA01566B9AEB@ALA-MBC.corp.ad.wrs.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] glibc: fixes for nscd and libnss-db X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 13:54:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 02:08 +0000, Huang, Jie (Jackie) wrote: > Ping, I didn't see any objection on this, but it's not merged yet, do > I miss anything? When we test it we see: WARNING: glibc-2.26-r0 do_package: glibc-extra-nss-2.26 was registered as shlib provider for libnss_db.so.2, changing it to libnss-db-2.26 because it was built later so it looks like you swapped one race for another? Cheers, Richard