From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com (mail-wm0-f67.google.com [74.125.82.67]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39029784F0 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 10:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f67.google.com with SMTP id y82so1588166wmg.1 for ; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 02:41:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RLVgFPMBZrJhTwV2ObqV6U307eVz/tacYoQnsedrD5o=; b=1HEUMD8eiYrvH/qhrHL/BckclFB6bGNEcDIk7qeqLV/jG2aI4nG9y7ubKoIN6sqO1c JtCPoqZ+w00p6ofd0iBwDAa4wjPWAnbNBXhLI144LlaweFCE2wQfwLZMjKJtbQUeisTz tnLGprgrS96pyB/+y9XMTjHYyK2msM+30vaI2du3WbLgn21QTwNw4F0TCu5WQYtSdWKd yvmNqtfiC46sSgVJ4PEyjteEsiysI6/wsjhwwykEEwPXGltyoxTwQ8tgnZFF4o657beV 19IIKjbp76xDIMO2OtcCsJ1PmMDXCPbK88ZStr5iUyPAnWT3kY3P7AK1jERfCf7u2Prh GRYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RLVgFPMBZrJhTwV2ObqV6U307eVz/tacYoQnsedrD5o=; b=lDCfsHiLz+SZwkB0n6D4knYYUzkpEhdjtOPf8Nr8iVbyA+D3ajFeBL8IslyVOl9IWz G3U0AC/LXZnQciHmuwfm0yvFcE9tMymKcEcoCGJputdiV04Pi1lC7ha+VElyq2Cv1VAg eU5EJEY5oVq44qjlKt4cNxrLE6nlscEGIyydAAdIUjsR/ENtgk7bxZDjJ7KdQ4B5blei ATWiTPDnu5uhxlQuM3gfcab7mU0Lb1dkvKAD7yPzt6WazHS2cSOqgK9xV++zMJvJLqxP sQMD4F6+9QQvOtx+WrZp6jnT8OJSGwk41mGMDCEn6wBK8WKP2277h0rmOLQDjL0vacrB 3ALQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLe33kja6YGOsZtw9d4jCgywzvKDT6tr7OmB7L20dUkYg3NuyEP uCp/f+rNNjQB4jPjwjWoGsTp X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotIlhRw0B87krjIqMs2wRuMKT7lD+PgEPNimgfZ0Pcy8RP8IHE2xsVsOEN66UCZ15A5CxVaWA== X-Received: by 10.28.62.20 with SMTP id l20mr4002820wma.6.1515062496024; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 02:41:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p54BD57AD.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [84.189.87.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w75sm8909401wrb.86.2018.01.04.02.41.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Jan 2018 02:41:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1515062493.10775.21.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9?= Bollo , wenzong fan Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 11:41:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20180104111826.5c8f9036@d-jobol.iot.bzh> References: <20170309140706.19814-1-jobol@nonadev.net> <1489075674.7785.368.camel@intel.com> <20170309174815.056bc5a2@d-jobol.iot.bzh> <1489079885.7785.371.camel@intel.com> <20170315090430.69b17cc1@d-jobol.iot.bzh> <20180104111826.5c8f9036@d-jobol.iot.bzh> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] shadow: 'useradd' copies root's extended attributes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 10:41:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 11:18 +0100, José Bollo wrote: > > Do you agree to move the patch to Smack specific layer? Such as  > > meta-security? > > I agree. Layers like meta-security should not modify recipes from other layers, at least not by default. That would violate the "Yocto Compatible 2.0" rules. Besides, it would be harder to maintain in a separate layer - for the maintainer of that layer. I still think this patch belong into OE-core, even though it is then more work for the OE-core maintainer. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.