From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SuNQX-0007KG-8h for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:44:25 +0200 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Jul 2012 05:32:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="173454540" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.37]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Jul 2012 05:32:52 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:32:51 +0100 Message-ID: <1515360.HL1K52tqqg@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.4 (Linux/3.2.0-27-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.4; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <2CA706BF-4D5B-4488-B128-B665F32A0DD3@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1343283462-25435-1-git-send-email-radu.moisan@intel.com> <2CA706BF-4D5B-4488-B128-B665F32A0DD3@dominion.thruhere.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dbus: include dbus-launch in the main dbus package X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:44:25 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Thursday 26 July 2012 14:29:14 Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 26 jul. 2012, om 14:00 heeft Burton, Ross het volgende geschreven: > > On 26 July 2012 12:55, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> It would be nice if other layers that have RDEPENDS_foo = "dbus-x11" keep > >> working till their maintainers get around fixing them. Note that you > >> might need to do a -c cleansstate on dbus first to trigger any errors.> > > Yes, and isn't that what the RPROVIDES is for? > > I'm not sure if bitbake can map RPROVIDES to PROVIDES, I vaguely remember > that it doesn't, but it will pick it up *after* do_package has run. I broke > OE way too many times doing things like that :) Why would it need to if we're talking about RDEPENDS and more specifically RDEPENDS defined before do_package? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre