From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30E178955 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 13:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id w24DSxxQ015181 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 4 Mar 2018 13:29:00 GMT Message-ID: <1520170139.3436.68.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Martin Jansa Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 13:28:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1520162580-30003-1-git-send-email-richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.3 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH][pyro] gcc6: Upgrade to 6.4.0 (latest stable series release) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 13:29:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sun, 2018-03-04 at 12:38 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > Is this backport of https://patches.openembedded.org/patch/144961/ ? > > If yes, why does it have different author? I suspect this was done independently and it wasn't realised that there was a patch that could be backported. We'll wait for Juro to comment. I posted it as I really wanted to get it reviewed, it passed the test builds and I'm keen to get some of these issues resolved before travel starts complicating things for me. Cheers, Richard