From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F797474B for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:42:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id w36Fg7Yv028063 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:42:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1523029327.2942.18.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Khem Raj , Charles-Antoine Couret Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 16:42:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20180406125354.21247-1-charles-antoine.couret@essensium.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.3 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Split glibc and libcrypt X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 15:42:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 08:03 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > this series is ok. Although dont like the fact its not upstream yet > but it reduces glibc baggage for future. Were you able to find out if glibc will definitely do this? I think applying this nativesdk is the only thing we can do right now and it does set us up well to migrate this further if glibc do go for this. After thinking about this a bit, the patch series needs a few minor tweaks to avoid wider testing failures: a) libxcrypt needs to SkipRecipe in the target case and be nativesdk     only b) We need an RDEPENDS_${PN}_append_class-nativesdk = " libxcrypto" in     glibc-package.inc c) The override used in glibc-pacjage.inc is wrong suggesting the code     can be dropped. Good news is a few of us tested this on f28, f27, ubuntu 1604 and 1710 and the new uninative built with it seems to work well. Cheers, Richard