From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1175377FEC for ; Mon, 14 May 2018 13:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id w4EDDH1h025492 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 May 2018 14:13:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1526303597.5720.115.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: chris.laplante@agilent.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 14:13:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1526286006.5720.113.camel@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.4 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: UNVERIFIED SENDER Re: Running BitBake multiple times without rechecking upstream AUTOREV versions X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 13:13:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 13:05 +0000, chris.laplante@agilent.com wrote: > Hi Richard, > > That looks perfect, thanks! On a related note, it seems "bitbake -- > revisions-changed" is broken in Sumo: > > ERROR: Command execution failed: Traceback (most recent call last): >   File "/home/laplante/yocto/sources/poky/bitbake/lib/bb/command.py", > line 116, in runAsyncCommand >     commandmethod(self.cmds_async, self, options) >   File "/home/laplante/yocto/sources/poky/bitbake/lib/bb/command.py", > line 723, in compareRevisions >     if bb.fetch.fetcher_compare_revisions(command.cooker.data): > TypeError: fetcher_compare_revisions() takes 0 positional arguments > but 1 was given > > > > Looks like commit 97617fd6755ffa25c058215ffb060cbb86240b44 dropped > the 'd' argument from that method, but command.py was never updated > to reflect that. > > Shall I submit a patch to change the line to be "if > bb.fetch.fetcher_compare_revisions():"  ? A patch to the bitbake list would be great thanks! Cheers, Richard