From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A4E7504C for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 22:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ted ([192.168.3.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id w51Mj4gG012529 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 1 Jun 2018 23:45:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1527893104.19847.8.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Andre McCurdy , Mark Hatle Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:45:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1527808243-20215-1-git-send-email-armccurdy@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.4 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH] tune-i586-nlp.inc: drop tuning file for Intel Quark/X1000 CPU X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:45:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 10:21 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Mark Hatle > wrote: > > > > On 5/31/18 6:10 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > > > > > > The Quark machine was EOL'ed at the end of 2017 and all support > > > for > > > it has now been removed from meta-intel. Drop the associated > > > tuning > > > file from oe-core. > > I would rather this remain.  There are still a lot of people using > > the quark > > based boards as hobbyists... there is little effort to maintain it > > for now. > > > > (we still have support for ARMv4 for instance, which hasn't really > > been used in > > new designs in a while..) > Is there ever a case when we would drop old tuning files? Or should > they live on forever? > > We dropped GPLv2 recipes from oe-core on the grounds that they are > old, unmaintained and untested. ARMv4 CPU tuning files meet those > criteria too. We removed the GPLv2 recipes as they created a false sense of security for people and a message needed to be sent out about them. They were a maintenance problem. These tune files aren't really causing a problem right now, from a maintenance or security perspective. Yes, we should remove things which are stale/obsolete and not useful but I think people are using this file and its not causing a problem. Cheers, Richard