From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RvYlI-0004sp-GJ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:30:28 +0100 Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2012 10:22:22 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="115943408" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.123.13]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2012 10:22:22 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:22:20 +0000 Message-ID: <1556143.JbHgubmlpB@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.0 (Linux/3.0.0-15-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <8E1320A1-3A67-47DB-96FD-8A75155AFA12@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <8E1320A1-3A67-47DB-96FD-8A75155AFA12@dominion.thruhere.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Koen Kooi Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] qt4: build qmake for the target X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:30:28 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Thursday 09 February 2012 19:18:19 Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 9 feb. 2012, om 18:57 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven: > > +++ b/meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt-4.8.0/qmake_pri_fixes.patch > > @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ > > +qmake: fix source file references in qmake.pri > > + > > +Fix duplicate entries in SOURCES and HEADERS, and fix the source file > > +list for the split of qlocale.cpp. > > + > > +Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton > > + > > +Upstream-Status: Pending > > Since qt upstream is git and you're including a SOB can you please add the > git-am'able version of the patches? That will also give us some more info > on how old the patch is since git is really bad at tracking renames. Ah yes, I recall you asking for this last time as well. Once I've heard from more people testing this I'll redo the patch against Qt git. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre