From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [143.182.124.37]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CB56CC4B for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:47:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2013 04:47:05 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,507,1378882800"; d="scan'208";a="411879929" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.8]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2013 04:47:04 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Koen Kooi , Saul Wold Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:47:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1578419.2XPu0WXrbc@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.8.0-31-generic; KDE/4.10.5; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <8BAC7D9C-A794-42B2-B31A-9FDC3AEB9FDC@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1381875766-20689-1-git-send-email-sgw@linux.intel.com> <1517941.hq8ryEHxA8@helios> <8BAC7D9C-A794-42B2-B31A-9FDC3AEB9FDC@dominion.thruhere.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] packagegroup-core-basic: libuser has a hard depenency on libpam X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:47:05 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 16 October 2013 13:23:08 Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 16 okt. 2013, om 12:25 heeft Paul Eggleton > het volgende geschreven: > > On Tuesday 15 October 2013 15:22:46 Saul Wold wrote: > >> Since libpam is only built when DISTRO_FEATURES pam is enabled we should > >> not be trying to build libuser also. > > > > Should this packagegroup be bringing in libraries such as this at all, > > given that libraries are generally pulled in as dependencies of > > applications that link to them? > > If it is a pure library, no. But libuser doesn't seem to be a pure library > package: > > [koen@rrMBP libuser]$ cat libuser/latest > PV = 0.58 > PR = r0 > PKGR = r0.0 > RPROVIDES = > RDEPENDS = eglibc (>= 2.17) glib-2.0 (>= 2.34.3) libffi (>= 3.0.11) libpam > (>= 1.1.6) popt (>= 1.16) RRECOMMENDS = > PKGSIZE = 283679 > FILES = /usr/bin/* /usr/sbin/* /usr/lib/libuser/* /usr/lib/lib*.so.* /etc > /com /var /bin/* /sbin/* /lib/*.so.* /lib/udev/rules.d > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d /usr/share/libuser /usr/lib/libuser/* > /usr/share/pixmaps /usr/share/applications /usr/share/idl /usr/share/omf > /usr/share/sounds /usr/lib/bonobo/servers FILELIST = /etc/libuser.conf > /usr/bin/lchfn /usr/bin/lchsh /usr/lib/libuser.so.1 > /usr/lib/libuser.so.1.4.0 /usr/lib/libuser/libuser_files.so > /usr/lib/libuser/libuser_shadow.so /usr/sbin/lchage /usr/sbin/lgroupadd > /usr/sbin/lgroupdel /usr/sbin/lgroupmod /usr/sbin/lid /usr/sbin/lnewusers > /usr/sbin/lpasswd /usr/sbin/luseradd /usr/sbin/luserdel /usr/sbin/lusermod Right, in that case, ignore me :) Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre