From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Si57p-0004pf-FS for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:46:17 +0200 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2012 07:35:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="183716236" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.123]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2012 07:35:28 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Saul Wold Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:35:26 +0100 Message-ID: <1747366.kqsrF4mgDg@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.2.0-25-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4FE0CB44.4030909@linux.intel.com> References: <4FE0A296.5090809@linux.intel.com> <2812027.e5PhAjC3T6@helios> <4FE0CB44.4030909@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Buildhistory for the PACKAGE Reorder X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:46:17 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday 19 June 2012 11:56:04 Saul Wold wrote: > On 06/19/2012 11:29 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 June 2012 09:02:30 Saul Wold wrote: > >> Please find attached the buildhistory_diff from 2 world builds with and > >> without the PACKAGE Reorder. > > > > Saul, would you mind pushing the buildhistory repo somewhere (e.g. to a > > poky- contrib branch)? That would help me debug some of the weirdness in > > the output there. > > Sorry it is available, was mentioned in my past emails, its in the > poky-contrib.git sgw/repack-buildhistory Ah, sorry, didn't think to look there. Upon closer inspection though it looks like the output you attached is the result of piping the output of buildhistory-diff through 'grep -v "PACKAGES changed order"' - which would explain the "duplicated" lines. By eliminating the lines containing that string you've also eliminated many lines that also contained the package name, and thus their items are concatenated underneath those for the previous package. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre