From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23BD71A60 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2016 19:18:32 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,544,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="23247223" Received: from sloi-mobl.gar.corp.intel.com (HELO peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.255.184.176]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2016 19:18:30 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: "Robert P. J. Day" Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:18:27 +1300 Message-ID: <17591012.2y05genbPg@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.7.8-100.fc23.x86_64; KDE/4.14.20; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <68D800E1-2594-4E8B-AB8E-6B9C758FD3CF@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: basic bitbake commands to create an SDK? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:18:32 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:51:16 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Khem Raj wrote: > > I would recommend to try using eSDK, which can be generated using > > -cpopulate_sdk_ext see > > > > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Application_Development_with_Extensible > > _SDK > just reading up on eSDKs now, am i correct in assuming that if i > have the time and space to build an eSDK, there is no downside > compared to building a standard SDK? as in, i don't lose anything from > the standard SDK, i just get a richer feature set, etc. Mostly correct, especially for master/morty where we sorted out the lack of gdb and a few scripts required to support the Eclipse plugin. There are differences though - please see the introduction of the latest SDK manual [1] for a comparison chart. Cheers, Paul [1] http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/sdk-manual/sdk-manual.html#sdk-manual-intro -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre