From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F215CD37AE for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 06:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-sanitizers: Add ptest support for AddressSanitizer tests To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org From: "Hemraj, Deepthi" X-Originating-Location: Bengaluru, Karnataka, IN (49.204.85.206) X-Originating-Platform: Windows Chrome 128 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 23:42:47 -0700 References: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <17622.1725432167987381530@lists.openembedded.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="hw5iktLN746IMek1gFFT" List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 06:42:56 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/204191 --hw5iktLN746IMek1gFFT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Richard, Thanks for checking the patch and your comment "Would it make more sense to run this as part of the other gcc testsuites?" Definitely Yes. We can add the sanitizer tests as part of the existing gcc = testsuites. However, the sanitizer test was intentionally kept separate to avoid unnece= ssary building and testing of sanitizers that are not required for most use= rs. The current activity was taken up when checking the sanitizers support for = all targets. This testsuite will just test the sanitizers support quickly w= ithin few minutes. Running the complete testsuite to check the sanitizers w= ould require few hours. Hence, we had planned and implemented the ptest spe= cifically for sanitizer support. However, we will add it as part of the complete testsuite if that seems mos= t profitable for everyone. Please let us know your views on the same so tha= t we can work towards the same. --hw5iktLN746IMek1gFFT Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Richard,
 
Thanks for che= cking the patch and your comment 
"Would it make mo= re sense to run this as part of the other gcc testsuites?"


Definitely Yes. We can add the sanitizer tests as part of the exis= ting gcc testsuites.

However, the sanitizer test was intentionally kept separate to avoid unn= ecessary building and testing of sanitizers that are not required for most = users. 

The curr= ent activity was taken up when checking the sanitizers support for all targ= ets. This testsuite will just test the sanitizers support quickly within few mi= nutes. Running the complete testsuite to check the sanitizers would require few= hours. Hence, we had planned and implemented the ptest specifically for saniti= zer support.

However,= we will add it as part of the complete testsuite if that seems most profit= able for everyone. Please let us know your views on the same so that we can wor= k towards the same.


--hw5iktLN746IMek1gFFT-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0856ECD37AE for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 06:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-sanitizers: Add ptest support for AddressSanitizer tests To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org From: "Hemraj, Deepthi" X-Originating-Location: Bengaluru, Karnataka, IN (49.204.85.206) X-Originating-Platform: Windows Chrome 128 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 23:43:26 -0700 References: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <17622.1725432167987381530@lists.openembedded.org> X-Old-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 23:42:47 -0700 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="hw5iktLN746IMek1gFFT" List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 06:43:36 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/204191 Message-ID: <20240904064326.xtxiAUHbUK6nuvov5QbeFp4ZlCMPCpj5lncJEdMfFi4@z> --hw5iktLN746IMek1gFFT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Richard, Thanks for checking the patch and your comment "Would it make more sense to run this as part of the other gcc testsuites?" Definitely Yes. We can add the sanitizer tests as part of the existing gcc = testsuites. However, the sanitizer test was intentionally kept separate to avoid unnece= ssary building and testing of sanitizers that are not required for most use= rs. The current activity was taken up when checking the sanitizers support for = all targets. This testsuite will just test the sanitizers support quickly w= ithin few minutes. Running the complete testsuite to check the sanitizers w= ould require few hours. Hence, we had planned and implemented the ptest spe= cifically for sanitizer support. However, we will add it as part of the complete testsuite if that seems mos= t profitable for everyone. Please let us know your views on the same so tha= t we can work towards the same. Thanks, Deepthi --hw5iktLN746IMek1gFFT Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Richard,
 
Thanks for che= cking the patch and your comment 
"Wo= uld it make more sense to run this as part of the other gcc testsuites?"


Definitely Yes. We can add the sanitizer tests as part of the exis= ting gcc testsuites.

However, the sanitizer test was intentionally kept separate to avoid unn= ecessary building and testing of sanitizers that are not required for most = users. 

The curr= ent activity was taken up when checking the sanitizers support for all targ= ets. This testsuite will just test the sanitizers support quickly within few mi= nutes. Running the complete testsuite to check the sanitizers would require few= hours. Hence, we had planned and implemented the ptest specifically for saniti= zer support.

However,= we will add it as part of the complete testsuite if that seems most profit= able for everyone. Please let us know your views on the same so that we can wor= k towards the same.

<= /span>
Thanks,
Deepthi
--hw5iktLN746IMek1gFFT--