Re: [PATCH 2/2] buildhistory: reduce the numeric delta to 10%

[Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>]

On Monday 30 July 2012 13:18:07 Ross Burton wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
> ---
>  meta/lib/oe/buildhistory_analysis.py |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/buildhistory_analysis.py
> b/meta/lib/oe/buildhistory_analysis.py index d0e0808..0a50432 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oe/buildhistory_analysis.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oe/buildhistory_analysis.py
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ numeric_fields = ['PKGSIZE', 'IMAGESIZE']
>  # Fields to monitor
>  monitor_fields = ['RDEPENDS', 'RRECOMMENDS', 'PACKAGES', 'FILELIST',
> 'PKGSIZE', 'IMAGESIZE'] # Percentage change to alert for numeric fields
> -monitor_numeric_threshold = 20
> +monitor_numeric_threshold = 10
>  # Image files to monitor (note that image-info.txt is handled separately)
>  img_monitor_files = ['installed-package-names.txt', 'files-in-image.txt']
>  # Related context fields for reporting (note: PE, PV & PR are always
> reported for monitored package fields)

I don't think I picked 20% completely out of thin air but I wasn't especially 
scientific about it either, so:

Acked-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre