From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-f169.google.com (mail-pg1-f169.google.com [209.85.215.169]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430B16BC7E for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 17:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg1-f169.google.com with SMTP id p6so6921899pgh.9 for ; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:51:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=vHFknsX98AHmjqY6JWvP7YSfwYWkxX9CQ6KrMFxleLE=; b=nTqdmoESFthfkw/c2po6nSmU+9M9EdwCkHWcxVyBT6IkZsvPq60RHhdQVh26aTeJoD fL7zTifa7tAaq4hqUoj1TnEUyz93tYvKTgpnzQYuAJatfPN9N7LR/qWAA705I62Oitk7 Zm7nZgcZGxwUr2ZUM+kiCuCXMROWK6+1+c1cVApk9pT7BF6K1aPjX6fHI6qerJs3711k +g8t8SHwba6xZCBRlvM4SBN3/ppudjD0rz5D1wzFHWeh9rzp6BS8CAbk+X4r+VYRcZR8 WFz9/ruA8IDCtWt/djjaX/ieGihXWtCt9ELUriNIEE0O8CbYCwMdff/FG7YlIznSvfNB IA9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language; bh=vHFknsX98AHmjqY6JWvP7YSfwYWkxX9CQ6KrMFxleLE=; b=bCTlJAyABVMzJ0w70tl//bIGYTSXdokJ940Ki6sTH8mgN4Yl5t+e/VufVSVSX/PkiP TwXBxNZezmQ1KqvloSHN3kgO4wJOyBo9i2GMiDoCUfhcEBMh4nGPe9isNAFVPtoPAnZq ApNZh1EvS1Uaw6qtkP034arfZzQOJiLt7Er5ZhkFjkb0JTWR5+/+wSuYcXW9OLoz+WUF eRf+bxIuxJLnsYnq283GdQYF8PobjT//6sFROwIEFM55PUq4lhu78irePJKomCTAUlj5 wVhswtsEAve+VyQfb7pJYmgYm5M55vzsffDo1TfdJKsJiDb+qI+V3SRKnrNtNGHqsq+N CndA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV7hlNO8T41LiLlLLDNoRYu4hyyTQFzXxy0v035GWMFou1eUGju 3YpYEm3sf0lAcHT5fdVRLYnbIQ4N X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzT9+NBKcbXKZq7OMz/n7rNyeEZ+sxlf8BTLUF6sjqGTzL1ORcBi+S6olKPEJ9YnRuCiuYbqg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:30c5:: with SMTP id w188mr43836471pgw.76.1554227484235; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.47.245.159] ([156.39.10.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d25sm19010311pfn.154.2019.04.02.10.51.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:51:23 -0700 (PDT) To: Martin Jansa References: <1552927535-19740-1-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> <20190319075206.GK20077@hiutale> <20190324180113.GA1947@jama> <20190324184803.GB1947@jama> From: akuster808 Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=akuster808@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFnlUP4BEADpKf+FQdLykenQXKk8i6xJNxDow+ypFeVAy8iFJp7Dsev+BtwUFo8VG7hx Jmd71vHMw+coBetWC3lk+IKjX815Ox0puYXQVRRtI+yMCgd6ib3oGxoQ8tCMwhf9c9/aKjaz mP97lWgGHbiEVsDpjzmMZGlJ6pDVZzxykkJExKaosE46AcA8KvfhRQg5zRyYBtinzs8Zu8AP aquZVHNXxPwjKPaSEEYqQjFeiNgFTavV+AhM2dmPmGUWCX9RZisrqA4slGwEB0srMdFf12Zg mD35Y9jZ80qpu5LPtJCFcsaAlebqR+dg36pIpiRR+olhN1wmC6LYP1vw6uMEYBjkTa2Rnb6+ C4FDzCJD4UCrUvLMNeTW810DY0bjMMj3SfmSGSfQUssaaaTXCVlLGuGxyCr/kza1rHaXMKum Ek4EFj1fyn7AfkSLEHfJfY4sO1tpgigvs4eD/4ZSQEXSu/TjVvyKx4EvUbhlGMRyH2CPwD/H 7DFF8tcVtJvCwUUW+zKtjxjSSLrhniNMXAOQJZ6CdaqCe4OyJQT5aRdr+FWbBRjpaRCCf5nf dTc88NMU9PrBT3vu0QJ5WNPO6MJpnb+d8iMNLZAz8tv8JMm2l+sMcNKSJ6lhX8peoBsfMVqc FgiykEO0fUt7DCbUYR5tLjM/3E5tHvTjMooVJyOxoufVLYtTtQARAQABtCFha3VzdGVyODA4 IDxha3VzdGVyODA4QGdtYWlsLmNvbT6JAj0EEwEIACcFAlnlUP4CGyMFCQlmAYAFCwkIBwIG FQgJCgsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ7ou0mfRW5/kuhRAAlR2FTq5572jrX5nnPR7AqI2bvSVb vqGLlvv739WhghvagbC+tu05QguopAhWW1/DcHK2+QtfIoC9UZrSW4RaO0CCo5sPjqK7l1KT ngWX/rGjF6xTF2QN0U/btcpMyVN2CNtVLwsDF9e+GHKoUcnFkP+JP8vHGokN9k6E/c97hLaL IJPeKl8LZXc2Efk+MaW1NXkfDJdcp/p+voajbihSQO6OZ/o+x9d2I3ZybKfTZ71+ek5Hxzjz g6KkMOI7KJjlmBlrQFAtVbS+CFAKrwkYznE6ggkcmGv3N7DeUBTUR78hf+EZEAM+ajeLMtrG rXE00pIb+gLGYPZxba5pCdQ+qWUW38qi9UnIRPm6fq7Ypx1r6XwJvbgCOkhbxo3D4YUdyC0b FE9lgrg8htbc9in4j2+hVI6ALswNjLprzXdzdKrd+T3Egx36o3Z/qrYsW2o5/A5sVvvASVKi wRPuEKhEhfmiHUPLvuKqhMoymHaz3fg5D2Q8G0gSDkLgeEpAjiWqf4+AGLx+MSDai7DSOsmI t61kWxs7cFTB32UrB/TDoVNn3Fm88ZFQpA/bngikE9jgEm045mSY86fNlbFj2mcCd0Ha1i1n aYc97RpgfjNMWyHDVHOGrNg/hJjkGa5RsAXkfyBwltHRw0Hj4urUQ3rr8um8PLe43SezPwXA oRoyDxC5Ag0EWeVQ/gEQALNHwj5VSPdnvXy1RXUuH+rclMx4x8zaqDyY0YqHfA7b/d8Y0VAt Y6YpzDeFTwD8A0Wfb7kZ2mlDIE6ODCB71uT/E3C6b+FiiN+lgzslznjUW+9l8ddDhRrC8HMG 37vrXF5h++PTXUKEKUlkDib1w093tu3mlJXUvIAzl8CEHkptF6Br0L9XxFwuWoNUfjT9IorQ 0SVIhvq5PhVAITXUD5fD7/N8B4TYegmHFRo1UaaKSnSHwlJJkzKpeWOH8QTYrP0RHxX86Obv IZuwbAo3F3oojcvLJt9NxWnbEmEALkleklLZnukgu7q5Wp1VDwhUbMFTLb6qmnBa/Xi30uOk 0l1TMHDbeQswvQDOZBAMukSRqyBetKxQ3iTfZ/3z1ubQRcVDbVlMDScSHQq0LK3F9yMOMM/6 0QPqJjl13xn/+Bn7WJiAIXXwzAV7uo6i0khFfjDtCDQ40aeffqOLxp1yMLkc3EKJGcQ5F6O2 ycEf4QXCYUbMXjxB0EJB8y7z+xOi5Mmd/pPlVmZ2gQK84NAL90p7n7jRlyf3gOUY+JOl4c5e UFiIhOzmuqNrvPOiZ02GXh6SGUU5y7IgSoIKvXSFgHAn2OG/tcspBmkyv6IuNVpmbmEgYn4I Rnt40UXVQkxTh0dENFhk2cjunMYozV/OqYCgmZLFSeJd8kAo4yn+yOtNABEBAAGJAiUEGAEI AA8FAlnlUP4CGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQ7ou0mfRW5/nNcg//R63cbOS6zLtvdnPub3Ssp1Ft8Wmv mni+kccuNApuDV7d63QckYxjAfUv2zYMLpbh87gVbLyCq9ASn552EbfRhTvHdk44CgbHBVcI ZBEdZWgRR5ViJakQSYHpP2e5AGNFnx9gSIuRTaa5rvZM+4xeoZ2vJiq93TtaYPr7UFNfK+c4 vv4C66lkt9l95/I10eSc3RqbOKZW47emlg4X3ygEoB9k2lPrpspyf6sUuSEi0WrlSxoLAr6p JG8rTUErYNeXe6JCdL31odDx1Dh5sdKIj2RicUYZNilxu9f1M7jZwf2ra1FGAlKj2ybqmgpZ EFteaiCinEYsvDyZyOiWHjAFI+RZIPQQL3AnVp4l7wYD3r9hnqYPww0slyMDcb9262RoFkHq dDwxPYarrNjWUpOzxB6bFxOgNRdCTgvQl8Ftk8a/yXB6vHeUSm1vPFCBxQPZytyfOLhEWm0J /mkVL0Z6iRK3p1LKnpLYCS4/esL2u7RrhPyCs2SsL58YcQF/g+PpeT9geZ+oyZ/4IQ+TWJoU PNHndk8VBTpzrmOaJxrebNL/W6C8JCmbLM11TAUMmHYi9JDytN8Au78hWpDbIdKwg1LeSxpw ZZD/OqOc0DBvHOpQhzkSrtR1lVlDV/+9E8J1T4uDhrGmZwYV+4xQetypHax8aAHisYbjXdVa 8CS2NxU= Message-ID: <17cbc6a5-4ef8-b618-91fc-6b4b16862213@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:51:22 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [thud][PATCH] Revert "boost: update to 1.69.0" X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:51:23 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------44BA55AC6ED3C2AE6D969E5D" Content-Language: en-US --------------44BA55AC6ED3C2AE6D969E5D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 4/2/19 12:18 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > Any update on this one? Or should we downgrade it on our side when > bumping oe-core/thud revision? I have this stagged but it missed the QA cutoff.  - armin > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 7:48 PM Martin Jansa > wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 11:45:08AM -0700, akuster808 wrote: > > > > > > On 3/24/19 11:01 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 07:52:06AM +0000, Mikko.Rapeli@bmw.de > wrote: > > >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote: > > >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:45 PM Armin Kuster > > wrote: > > >>>> This reverts commit a384248938ea9db096866bf4ec8678d35ca62a12. > > >>>> > > >>>> This package update slipped in doing the maint process. > Removing it. > > >> > > >>> Just my opinion - don't consider this as NAK. > > >>> > > >>> * I already fixed the recipes that failed for me. For at > least one the > > >>> change is no more compatible to 1.68.0. > > >>> * This makes PV going backwards > > >>> > > >>> Thanks for addressing - what do others think? > > >> I'm not using thud yet, but updating boost in stable branch > would break > > >> too many things and I would have to revert that change in our > trees. Some boost > > >> updates are in the end quite trivial and just require recompiling > > >> everything but still, I would prefer that boost is not > updated in stable > > >> branches unless there is a huge security/stability issue with > the old version. > > > Agreed. > > > > > > I care less for PV going backwards nowadays, it's probably > less annoying than > > > bumping PE first in master and then backporting PE bump to thud. > > > > > > People with build issues related to boost upgrade probably never > > > built whole image to push it as an upgrade to end devices. > > > > So do you agree with the revert? > > I do. > > -- > Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com > > --------------44BA55AC6ED3C2AE6D969E5D Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 4/2/19 12:18 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
Any update on this one? Or should we downgrade it on our side when bumping oe-core/thud revision?
I have this stagged but it missed the QA cutoff. 

- armin

On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 7:48 PM Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 11:45:08AM -0700, akuster808 wrote:
>
>
> On 3/24/19 11:01 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 07:52:06AM +0000, Mikko.Rapeli@bmw.de wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:45 PM Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> This reverts commit a384248938ea9db096866bf4ec8678d35ca62a12.
> >>>>
> >>>> This package update slipped in doing the maint process. Removing it.
> >> <snip>
> >>> Just my opinion - don't consider this as NAK.
> >>>
> >>> * I already fixed the recipes that failed for me. For at least one the
> >>> change is no more compatible to 1.68.0.
> >>> * This makes PV going backwards
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for addressing - what do others think?
> >> I'm not using thud yet, but updating boost in stable branch would break
> >> too many things and I would have to revert that change in our trees. Some boost
> >> updates are in the end quite trivial and just require recompiling
> >> everything but still, I would prefer that boost is not updated in stable
> >> branches unless there is a huge security/stability issue with the old version.
> > Agreed.
> >
> > I care less for PV going backwards nowadays, it's probably less annoying than
> > bumping PE first in master and then backporting PE bump to thud.
> >
> > People with build issues related to boost upgrade probably never
> > built whole image to push it as an upgrade to end devices.
>
> So do you agree with the revert?

I do.

--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

--------------44BA55AC6ED3C2AE6D969E5D--