From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C440C64ED8 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 08:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com (mail-wr1-f54.google.com [209.85.221.54]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.85780.1677487024145811371 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:37:04 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=google header.b=N/59IV49; spf=pass (domain: linuxfoundation.org, ip: 209.85.221.54, mailfrom: richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org) Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id l25so5291213wrb.3 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:37:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xDtCcOd21yNhQEWCmfmOl063a5JtdcHEHjBpPdXgCc8=; b=N/59IV49jI9yGQS2DZwtB/MmqeElxZYVQwtjAptaaUM3SlxSVTMfo9giQhba450t57 vh+xntZV3YHNQBVJuhrDEm6VaSNqbYM7heoYYpC1shlJu4bqUdED1PkMu/Gk1UuwwYSt scSObZhXhWiGYtxTCKISYV5B5c0X8favE/Xdk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xDtCcOd21yNhQEWCmfmOl063a5JtdcHEHjBpPdXgCc8=; b=gC85lsxlGFR+JrLu3MHZelJ3j13uqZWGQSi+MWyt3bD+uGIIoOXoOrP0H4+JRVd88p dTIzf0rt0E7eTq2x1I8br99MGNvTw7G+FrcCUMBDO1dXHaig0m8x3iQ4+T+FAP/qsde5 ONMZJPc54TPX+7DRXxTt2CMeVTAZXqy3VXhWYnbGWxFKP2u8ByXIvbWTesReA3pTHKJB 6d94jbcCWD3n9zzilH3e/40jbStvZXdSgea6fOULPsXgBFUFjgg+3oED6vMSHYsODq4a N9YsYnQvi4Kqk2mv7wnXbyTSmuGx9S/+ZA6kgG3Ot6C0fGvKiM//AoZtVQ/QM+IiMKsM 3jUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUvwSaH0cMcJleBx3h6qfrP+Ialh4AVkpFadryOZgknvqfAqG5z CQhpmPc3oV18UQeFlkwLH96TKg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/0oRsjPigbtPGqzoNDlDb6OrdpRlMhenrbnBMAx6DUwk9EJ5B07J21zch2Q7xyuv5XbNIk0A== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4dd1:0:b0:2c7:a39:6e30 with SMTP id f17-20020a5d4dd1000000b002c70a396e30mr14156969wru.38.1677487022477; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:37:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8b0:aba:5f3c:b7e8:d302:d51:7008? ([2001:8b0:aba:5f3c:b7e8:d302:d51:7008]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y14-20020adfee0e000000b002c71b4d476asm6488403wrn.106.2023.02.27.00.37.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:37:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <18613bd480d5dc517c329b1cb541cbdc05d2a8e6.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] binutils: Enable --enable-new-dtags From: Richard Purdie To: Khem Raj , Alexandre Belloni Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 08:37:01 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <20230223065816.3151823-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 08:37:11 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/177776 On Sun, 2023-02-26 at 22:43 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 5:56=E2=80=AFPM Khem Raj wro= te: > >=20 > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 3:34 PM Alexandre Belloni > > wrote: > > >=20 > > > Could this be the cause of this? > > >=20 > > > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230223-= 79c9rmcw/packages/diff-html/ > >=20 > > most likely yes. I will take a look. Lets work on merging the other > > binutils and gdb upgrade patch meanwhile. >=20 > I looked at the diffoscope outputs you posted and it is noting the > difference in EFL flags >=20 > changing from > 0x0000000000000018 (BIND_NOW) > to > 0x000000000000001e (FLAGS) BIND_NOW >=20 > However, in my local build I see that when I enable --enable-new-dtags > than I always get > 0x000000000000001e (FLAGS) BIND_NOW >=20 >=20 > but when I check the glibc builds without the patch then I get flags > to be 0x0000000000000018 >=20 > So I wonder if we are comparing previously built glibc ( using > binutils without this patch ) > with glibc compiled with binutils using this patch. I think that is possible and there is some task hash dependency issue in here somewhere :/ Cheers, Richard