From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1StbpM-0004lI-8t for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:54:52 +0200 Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2012 02:43:23 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="184833090" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.60]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2012 02:43:22 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Martin Jansa Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:43:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1906764.DupgyPkgTn@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.4 (Linux/3.2.0-26-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.4; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1610928.T7hSJDQ7P6@helios> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: more pedantry: inconsistent presentation of how to introduce layers X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:54:52 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday 24 July 2012 11:29:26 Martin Jansa wrote: > > As I mentioned before, the priority currently has no bearing on the order > > of BBPATH - that is determined by the order in which the layer conf files > > are parsed and (as you highlight) whether they prepend or append to > > BBPATH. Remember that the BBPATH only affects how class and conf files > > are found - it does not have anything to do with recipes. > > And order of .bbappends applied, no? In case some recipe has > .bbappends in multiple layers and > later layer is trying to override some setting which is also altered > by some bbappend in layer between. No. The order of bbappend application is layer priority order, or if bbappends for the same recipe are in layers with the same layer priority, the order is the order in which the layers are parsed (= the order in which the layers appear in bblayers.conf). Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre